Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

October 17th., A Spanish Judge, Guillermo Ruiz Polanco decided to hold a preliminary hearing of the case brought by the family of José Courso against Lieutenant Colonel Philip DeCamp, Captain Philip Wolford and Sergeant Shawn Gibson.

Just before firing at the journalists in the Palestine Hotel they attacked two Arab stations on the other side of the river, one of them had a static camera on the roof and 126 bullets holes were shown in the wall around the camera, but they rescued the film and it has been shown all over the world. Then they took out Al Jazeera in fact all witnesses before attacking the journalists in the Palastine hotel.

Unfortunately, a French camera crew was filming close by with the Hotel Palestine in the back ground and showed there were no shots coming from the Hotel at any time before or during the attack - but they heard and recorded the attack of the tank. All this has been on Spanish TV on the anniversary of this highly inflammatory incident.

1 posted on 10/20/2003 1:05:26 PM PDT by Ace Correspondent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ace Correspondent
I wonder how many journalists were killed on 9/11?
2 posted on 10/20/2003 1:08:26 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
A Spanish Judge, Guillermo Ruiz Polanco decided to hold a preliminary hearing of the case brought by the family of José Courso against Lieutenant Colonel Philip DeCamp, Captain Philip Wolford and Sergeant Shawn Gibson.

Ahhh, I see! So when they get killed then they claim a nationality. It's only when they are alive that they are the independent, supra-national, objective observers whose perspectives are not bound by the constraints of allegiance to any country.

Ummm...anyways...yeah...the US military decided to take a joyride wasting ammo, diverting their attention and otherwise exploiting the opportunity to show themselves to be blithering idiots by firing on an "innocent" building full of civilians for no apparent reason.

Right...

3 posted on 10/20/2003 1:15:33 PM PDT by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

As a whole, journalists oppose the US.


They knew the risks of being there. They unfortunately were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Their lives are worth no more than our troops who have been ruthlessly murdered lately. Murders The VV couldn't care less about.
4 posted on 10/20/2003 1:16:51 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals ("It's the economy, stupid"...is now "Bush is a dumb Nazi liar." It has been decided by the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
Since the Iraqi government refused to lay down it's arms, etc., then THEY are ultimately responsible for any such "war-crimes".
6 posted on 10/20/2003 1:19:56 PM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
A perfectly impartial investigation was undertaken by the non-partisan NGO the Committee to Protect Journalists. Clearly, we should turn our soldiers over to foreign courts for judgement. There is no other way to uphold international law </sarcasm>
8 posted on 10/20/2003 1:27:32 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
From what I've read, there are a few details omitted from this story. One of them is that uniformed Iraqis were present and visible on the hotel itself, supposedly providing some security to the journalists.

Whether there was shooting coming from the hotel is irrelevant. The troops thought that the hotel was being used by Iraqis as a forward observation post to call for and adjust supporting arms. That is a legitimate target regardless of whether or not direct fire is emanating from the building itself. The soldiers on the scene see guys with binoculars and members of the Iraqi military. Probably some antennae as well. That would certainly look like an OP to the nervous troops who are on the receiving end of those supporting arms. So they request permission to shoot, its given, and they fire.

The actions of the LCol. who was trying to ensure that this did not happen, bear out that this was just a mistake, not a conscious effort to kill journalists. Sadly, troops have mistakenly killed some of their own out of a mistaken belief that they were firing at the enemy. That's the kind of stuff that happens in the fog of war, and when you're scared. The only explanation for the presumption of malice in this case is anti-American bias.

9 posted on 10/20/2003 1:28:05 PM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
One of the facts of life is that military combat is inherently dangerous. If the soldiers on teh tank that fired the shot reasonabvly believed they were firingf at the enemy then oh well too bad the journalists knew the risk in advance. although their status as "journalists" is somewhat questionable becuase almost all those at that hotel at that time had been aiding the Saddam regime by spreading its propaganda.

It is a fact of life that people in a combat zone are subject to being fired upon that is why they call it a combat zone. Anyone who has been on teh recieving end of fire will tell you it is not always clear where that fire is coming from.

Get over it

12 posted on 10/20/2003 1:34:37 PM PDT by harpseal (stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB; centurion316; ExSoldier; archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; Squantos; ...
Free Republic Treadhead Ping


13 posted on 10/20/2003 1:36:40 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Load, spherical case, 800 yards, by detail, LOAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
In a moral universe, there is no excuse for killing journalists under any circumstances.

Oh, I don't know about that...

14 posted on 10/20/2003 1:36:48 PM PDT by wizardoz (Palestinians are just dynamite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
Someone shot Journey? Was Steve Perry hit? What will we do now for quality music? Oh, the horror...
15 posted on 10/20/2003 1:45:24 PM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
Video Camera vs. Rocket Propelled Grenade Launcher


24 posted on 10/20/2003 2:14:42 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Load, spherical case, 800 yards, by detail, LOAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
They Shoot Journeys, Don't They?

Wow, these guys sure hope not!


28 posted on 10/20/2003 2:23:32 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
"In a moral universe, there is no excuse for killing journalists under any circumstances."

First we kill all the lawyers...

29 posted on 10/20/2003 2:28:20 PM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent

Camera or Launcher? Think fast, now. If you're wrong, you die.

30 posted on 10/20/2003 2:50:36 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Load, spherical case, 800 yards, by detail, LOAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ace Correspondent
You should appreciate this link:

Spain to probe US 'war crime'

34 posted on 10/20/2003 3:44:30 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Gunner, HEAT, ATGM . . .Identified. . .FIRE . . . On the Way . . . Target, cease fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson