Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty; STARWISE
Starwise asked, "When did we become a right-to-die society?"

Here is a repost of my earlier message to you that disappeared when the thread it was on was pulled:

The Death Culture in Florida

Our society turned into a right-to-die society when technological advances made it possible to sustain the life, of the shell of a body, beyond the point of tolerance of pain or beyond the point of measurable brain activity.

As a first world country, we do an amazing job of keeping people going physically, but we are truly lousy at providing any quality of life. We interfere with the life/death cycle by using extreme medical measures when, under normal circumstances, the person would just pass on to a better place. (As in the case of extremely premature babies...)

It was a logical step in the progress of man overall that we had to become a "right-to-die" society. We had to preserve the individual's right to hold up his hand and say, "No, I don't want chemotherapy." or "Never put me on a respirator".

It didn't take long for the greedy ones to step in and start calling something as simple as a feeding tube or an IV or rehabilitative therapy 'extreme medical intervention'. By doing so they were able to eliminate lives ahead of schedule to avoid draining their resources or their inheritances (materialism run amok!). And the churches and the people unknowingly sat back and let a few immoral judges make this leap into a new "death culture".

Once this radical new "death culture" was established, hospices began to spring up everywhere. It was natural. People dying and their loved ones are in an extremely emotionally vulnerable time of life. Once they are moved to hospice, they are easily persuaded to leave all their money to these death camps.

"But", you are screaming, "it is so much better now that there is hospice available!"

On the surface and in a few good small volunteer driven homes, perhaps you are right. But in the large death mills, non-profit or for-profit, it is all about advancing the theory that society needs to dump their "burdens".

Some religions, possibly with great foresight, will not allow any medical interference. Those of us who choose to accept the services of doctors need to acknowledge the risks that we are taking with this possibly unnatural level of interference.<

303 posted on 10/29/2003 7:23:41 PM PST by TaxRelief (Ask me about the connection between Socialism, Communism, Drug Warlords and Vodka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TaxRelief
Check out this excerpt from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum :

""EUTHANASIA" KILLINGS

Forced sterilization in Germany was the forerunner of the systematic killing of the mentally ill and the handicapped. In October 1939, Hitler himself initiated a decree which empowered physicians to grant a "mercy death" to "patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgment of their state of health." The intent of the socalled "euthanasia" program, however, was not to relieve the suffering of the chronically ill. The Nazi regime used the term as a euphemism: its aim was to exterminate the mentally ill and the handicapped, thus "cleansing" the Aryan race of persons considered genetically defective and a financial burden to society."

Link here:
http://www.holocaust-trc.org/hndcp.htm
307 posted on 10/29/2003 7:27:16 PM PST by PeyersPatches (I have intestinal fortitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson