Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Etruscan Demons, Monsters Unearthed
Discovery news.com ^ | 11-5-2003 | Rossella Lorenzi

Posted on 11/05/2003 8:18:48 AM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: MarcoPolo
I hear a popular saying in Northern Italy is: "When you travel south of Rome, you are in Africa." ;-)
21 posted on 11/05/2003 11:09:43 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shamusotoole
Too early.

The great Roman historians wrote most usefully of things of their own time - Tacitus, Caesar, etc. Only Livy went back to the origins of Rome, and his work is very unreliable.
22 posted on 11/05/2003 11:18:59 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
My theory is that they were like Basques (also an isolate).

They were much more interesting than Basques though.
23 posted on 11/05/2003 11:21:13 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Evil Inc
The Celts/Gauls were later invaders and occupiers of Northern Italy. They fought both Etruscans and Romans.
24 posted on 11/05/2003 11:22:31 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Post modern man --- liberals - rats !


25 posted on 11/05/2003 11:27:43 AM PST by f.Christian (( Alpha - Omega Design - Architecture ... designeduniverse.com --- Science3000 ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Really? Hm. That IS interesting. Old, oft-quoted folk sayings are often full of hidden truths.
26 posted on 11/05/2003 3:59:22 PM PST by MarcoPolo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Fascinating and absolutely NOTHING like anything I've ever seen previously, attributted to the Etruscans.
27 posted on 11/05/2003 7:40:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Ahhhhhhhhh ... the Aeneid ! I I SING OF ARMS AND ARMAMENTS " ... the onpening line, when said by a male. When said by a female, those same lines read : " I SING OF A MAN'S ARMS AND THE ARMS HE CARRIES ."
28 posted on 11/05/2003 7:44:17 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Thanks for the post. Significant new finds are always interesting.
29 posted on 11/05/2003 7:44:51 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Okay, so you can recite the first three words of the Aeneid.

But can you recite the first ten lines of the Oddessey??

a billion years ago, back in high school, we had to memorize it, and I can still recite part of it from memory.

so there, na na.
30 posted on 11/05/2003 7:51:59 PM PST by fqued ("He who doesn't reboot at least once a day is not using the capacity of his computer.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bill and Hillary?
31 posted on 11/05/2003 7:56:53 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
like the BAsques

An interesting bit of research found that the Basques are not genetically different from their neighbours, only linguistically. Of course, being a small population they must have intermingled with the communities around them. The basque language is also supposed to be related to the Chechen. The other non-IndoEuropean linguistic group in Europe is the Finnish-Ugaritic group to which Finnish and some Baltic languages belong.

Weren't the Celts also Indo-European? Not Aryan though.
32 posted on 11/06/2003 12:36:49 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Found this list of Indo-European language groups:

Subfamily Group Subgroup Languages and Principal Dialects
Anatolian     Hieroglypic Hittite*, Hittite (Kanesian)*, Luwian*, Lycian*, Lydian*, Palaic*
Baltic     Latvian (Lettish), Lithuanian, Old Prussian*
Celtic Brythonic   Breton, Cornish*, Welsh
Celtic Continental   Gaulish*
Celtic Goidelic or Gaelic   Irish (Irish Gaelic), Manx*, Scottish Gaelic
Germanic East Germanic   Burgundian*, Gothic*, Vandalic*
Germanic North Germanic   Old Norse* (see Norse): Danish, Faeroese, Icelandic, Norwegian, Swedish
Germanic West Germanic (see Grimm's law) High German German, Yiddish
Germanic West Germanic (see Grimm's law) Low German Afrikaans, Dutch, English, Flemish, Frisian, Plattdeutsch (see German language)
Greek     Aeolic*, Arcadian*, Attic*, Byzantine Greek*, Cyprian*, Doric*, Ionic*, KoinE*, Modern Greek
Indo-Iranian Dardic or Pisacha   Kafiri, Kashmiri, Khowar, Kohistani, Romany (Gypsy), Shina
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan   Pali*, Prakrit*, Sanskrit*, Vedic*
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan Central Indic Hindi, Hindustani, Urdu
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan East Indic Assamese, Bengali, Bihari, Oriya
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan Northwest Indic Punjabi, Sindhi
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan Pahari Central Pahari, Eastern Pahari (Nepali), Western Pahari
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan South Indic Marathi (including major dialect Konkani), Singhalese (Sinhalese)
Indo-Iranian Indic or Indo-Aryan West Indic Bhili, Gujarati, Rajasthani (many dialects)
Indo-Iranian Iranian   Avestan*, Old Persian*
Indo-Iranian Iranian East Iranian Baluchi, Khwarazmian*, Ossetic, Pamir dialects, Pushtu (Afghan), Saka (Khotanese)*, Sogdian*, Yaghnobi
Indo-Iranian Iranian West Iranian Kurdish, Pahlavi (Middle Persian)*, Parthian*, Persian (Farsi), Tajiki
Italic (Non-Romance)   Faliscan*, Latin, Oscan*, Umbrian*
Italic Romance or Romanic Eastern Romance Italian, Rhaeto-Romanic, Romanian, Sardinian
Italic Romance or Romanic Western Romance Catalan, French, Ladino, Portuguese, Provençal, Spanish
Slavic or Slavonic East Slavic   Belorussian (White Russian), Russian, Ukrainian
Slavic or Slavonic South Slavic   Bulgarian, Church Slavonic*, Macedonian, Serbo-Croatian, Slovenian
Slavic or Slavonic West Slavic   Czech, Kashubian, Lusatian (Sorbian or Wendish), Polabian*, Polish, Slovak
Thraco-Illyrian     Albanian, Illyrian*, Thracian*
Thraco-Phrygian     Armenian, Grabar (Classical Armenian)*, Phrygian*
Tokharian (W China)     Tokharian A (Agnean)*, Tokharian B (Kuchean)*

33 posted on 11/06/2003 12:39:53 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
TRue, the Aenied seems very much like the Romans were desperate to show that they were not barbarians at earlier times. Which they were. The GReeks themselves (contrary to the dad in 'My Big Fat GReek Wedding') were themselves barbarians before and even arguably IN the Mycenean age (1500 to 1200 B.C.) when the war against Troy took place. After that, they went into stagnation until the rise of the city states. A 1700 BC date of the Minoan civilisation in Crete still makes it a comparatively infantile civilisation compared to those in the Nile, Euphrates-Tiger and Indus valleys with their early points stretching back to 3100 BC (for the scorpion king) and 4000 B.C. (for the Sumerians in what is now modern day Iraq).

History is fascinating, eh?
34 posted on 11/06/2003 12:45:30 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
The * indicate dead languages.
35 posted on 11/06/2003 12:49:01 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
few traces of their puzzling, non-Indo-European language survive

Related to the Basques?

Greenberg includes Etruscan in Eurasiatic, although not enthusiastically (there really isn't much data)

See Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family: vol. I Grammar and Vol II Lexicon by Joseph Greenberg (the greatest linguist of the 20th century)

Soviet linguists have concluded that Basque is part of a Dene-Sino-Caucasic phylum that includes na-Dine (Athabaskan (icl Navaho and Apache), Sino-tibeten, Yeniesian (Kott and Kett), Burushaski, Basque, and the non-Kartvelian Caucasian tongues.

Discussed in On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy by Merritt Ruhlen.

36 posted on 11/06/2003 1:02:19 AM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
few traces of their puzzling, non-Indo-European language survive

Related to the Basques?

Greenberg includes Etruscan in Eurasiatic, although not enthusiastically (there really isn't much data)

See Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family: vol. I Grammar and Vol II Lexicon by Joseph Greenberg (the greatest linguist of the 20th century)

Soviet linguists have concluded that Basque is part of a Dene-Sino-Caucasic phylum that includes na-Dine (Athabaskan (icl Navaho and Apache), Sino-tibeten, Yeniesian (Kott and Kett), Burushaski, Basque, and the non-Kartvelian Caucasian tongues.

Discussed in On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy by Merritt Ruhlen.

37 posted on 11/06/2003 1:05:25 AM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Could you please add me to your "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" ping list?

Thanks!

38 posted on 11/06/2003 1:24:20 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fqued
I'd wager you went to a Jesuit high school in the NE : )
39 posted on 11/06/2003 6:54:04 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nopardons


40 posted on 11/06/2003 7:05:18 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson