Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican and Democratic Panel Leaders Take Feud to the Senate Floor
NYTimes ^ | 11/06/03 | NyTimes

Posted on 11/06/2003 10:16:32 AM PST by Grit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Grit
OK, I'll hand your project back to you. Excellent idea for tracking stories, BTW. Think we should keep the concept.
41 posted on 11/06/2003 11:51:27 AM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I wonder if any of those questionable news sources will include this in relevant articles:

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

42 posted on 11/06/2003 11:52:43 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Very telling that only FNC gave the full text of the memo.

Especially when one understands that giving the full text...at least online...is a perfect sidebar to the story about the controversy concerning the text.

In fact, I would suggest that if it was a GOP memo, every website would link to the full text as a sidebar to the main story. Journalistically, it just makes sense and is quite obvious....and the fact that only FNC chose to do basic journalism here is very telling that there is bias in the others newspapers/networks.
43 posted on 11/06/2003 11:55:07 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1997_cr/s970306-lake.htm

Democrat Senator Bob Graham (Florida), March 6, 1997 [NOMINATION OF ANTHONY LAKE]:

"Some history. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has a hard-earned and proud tradition of bipartisanship. It is the successor to the Church committee of 1975-76, which was an investigative committee only. The purpose of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is both to oversee sensitive intelligence activities and to maintain and improve intelligence capabilities and efficiency.

The issues that come before the committee, including the nomination of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, are extremely sensitive. They demand a high level of bipartisanship. I fear that the committee's bipartisanship is fraying and that fair play is falling victim to partisan gamesmanship.

That, Mr. President, should concern all of us, Republican and Democrat alike. Intelligence activities, by their sensitive nature, run counter to Democratic principles of openness. Yet, in my view, good intelligence is essential to our democracy's security.

Effective congressional oversight, in turn, is a critical ingredient to maintaining some balance between these two inherently contradictory forces--democratic openness and the necessary secrecy that surrounds intelligence procedures and operations. Oversight is a serious responsibility. The public must have confidence that we are above politics when we deal with intelligence issues.

In almost every other area of Federal Government, the public has multiple sources of information. That is what freedom of speech and freedom of press provide in a democratic society. But as it relates to the operations of the intelligence community, the general public must rely on a handful of its representatives to provide the necessary oversight and scrutiny to assure that the operations are being conducted in a manner that advances the public interest and assures that the public interest is not being rendered vulnerable by clandestine operations."

These are direct quotes from Senator Graham.

44 posted on 11/06/2003 12:26:02 PM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
In fact, I would suggest that if it was a GOP memo, every website would link to the full text as a sidebar to the main story.

I'll bet you're correct...

45 posted on 11/06/2003 12:26:56 PM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Grit
Informative chart!

The Establishment Media ( no reason to dignify them with "mainstrean;" they're not ) is trying the old "we just won't talk about it" that they perfected during Little Big Fraud's reign.

We'll see if the new internet & talk radio axis can overcome it.

46 posted on 11/06/2003 12:39:20 PM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
"Backhoe is All over it. :)"

Like a heavy sweat. :-)

47 posted on 11/06/2003 1:03:37 PM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
"I certainly hope the Republicans remove their jackets and roll up their sleeves on this one.

Not a chance....

We will see the light in the loafers prance of the Metrosexuals by the Republicans....

Remember -- Hillary STILL has the FBI files on most of the Republicans still in office...

They remain in a self preservation mode -- not in a combative mode, and THAT is exactly what has encouraged the Democrat to behave so badly - lately..

NO CONSEQUENCES for bad behavior...

Only the voters have been reacting with a vengence against the Democrats -- by voting them OUT OF OFFICE...

Semper Fi

48 posted on 11/06/2003 1:13:11 PM PST by river rat (War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
In order to get their socialist revolution, they have to destroy the society we have first before they can come in as the saviors

Well, I just think the American people might not let that happen. Sen. Zell Miller put it best when he said "the DemocRATS are headed for a train wreck".

49 posted on 11/06/2003 2:46:45 PM PST by teletech (Have we dug up Saddam yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Like your bio-page river rat. You are correct about the Republicans. I was just hopefully optimistic. Were you in the Delta in the 60s?
50 posted on 11/06/2003 3:46:05 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson