Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Camilla: My Charles would never do that!
People UK ^ | Nov 9, 2003

Posted on 11/09/2003 4:16:32 PM PST by george wythe

Furious Royal mistress Camilla Parker Bowles last night slammed the "Charles-and-a-servant" scandal and insisted: "My prince would never do that."

Fighting back tears of rage, she dismissed the sleazy gossip as a "pack of vicious, evil lies" and added: "He would never stoop so low.

"Charles is a man of utter integrity and honesty. I trust him implicitly."

Camilla bitterly blamed Princess Diana's supporters for dragging up the claims made by a discredited former servant.

She told one confidante: "It's all so cruel and unfair. I know Charles better than anyone and there is not one iota of truth in this. How could there be?"

But stunned Camilla knows the public love royal gossip and fears people will think: "There's no smoke without fire."

The revelations broke while the 54-year-old prince was thousands of miles away on an official trip to India and the Gulf.And loyal Camilla, who has been phoning him several times a day, admitted he now sounds "miserable and adrift".

She revealed: "Charles told me all about this nonsense long, long ago. I dismissed it as the bitter ramblings of a disturbed alcoholic.

"But now it has come back to haunt us and his reputation is going to be dragged through the mire."

Camilla backed Charles's private secretary Sir Michael Peat for going on TV to denounce the prince's involvement in the "compromising" incident allegedly witnessed by former valet George Smith.

One of her friends told The People: "She thinks they couldn't just sit back and let the rumours build around the globe like a raging inferno. She knows the incident never happened.

"William and Harry know their father could never have done what is claimed. They say it is all complete fantasy.

"It is even more galling because Diana was behind the tape that started all this.

"When she recorded George Smith's claims, she knew she had a little bit of dynamite and could set it off in her husband's face whenever she needed too.

"Camilla realises Diana's most devoted supporters would love her to have the last laugh from beyond the grave. It's like a curse on her and Charles - andd she is horrified to think the public might actually believe these lies."

Charles himself gave permission for Sir Michael to make his official denial statement. He confided to courtiers at Clarence House that he felt "stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea".

And he told them: "I have nothing to fear about the rumour apart from the rumour itself."

One source said: "He thought it was pointless to pursue the tactic of burying your head in the sand in the hope it would go away.

"He felt going on the offensive was the only thing that could minimise the damage to his reputation.

"For all that has been claimed, Charles is still very keen to be King one day. A rumour like this could have completely destroyed his chances and he was not going to let that happen."

Senior royal staff at Clarence House agree that it is the biggest crisis the prince has had to face since Diana's death.

The British media has been banned by the High Court from disclosing details of the allegations.

Charles's ex-valet Michael Fawcett also originally gagged the Press from naming him.

But that injunction was lifted on Thursday after a newspaper said it had no intention of repeating claims about him.

Royal watchers and public relations advisers were split last night about whether the prince's tactic would be effective.

Royal author Ingrid Seward said: "It's quite unprecedented for his private secretary to come out and make a statement about something which we probably know about - but the great world at large don't really know what he's talking about.

"I don't think the allegation is something people would particularly want to hear."


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: princecharles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: doug from upland
Hillary: My husband would never do that.

Hitlery thinks she is royalty.

We peasants are supposed to believe any good ol' story she tells us.

Hitlery's royal household is not better than the Windsors' family.

21 posted on 11/09/2003 4:39:27 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
I can't believe it -- 20 post without mention of Charles and a tampon in the same breath??
22 posted on 11/09/2003 4:39:34 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Guess Diana was a very smart woman and knew that she had to have some "goods" to leverage otherwise she would have been toast and the "Royals" could say anything about her and be done with her....one smart cookie !!! Looks as if Diana may have the last word.
23 posted on 11/09/2003 4:41:01 PM PST by MissL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
George Smith was/is a drunk and mental case, whether the Royal Family says so or not
24 posted on 11/09/2003 4:45:11 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (You realize, of course, this means war?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
The Man who would be Queen
25 posted on 11/09/2003 4:45:35 PM PST by 8mmMauser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrueBeliever9
I believe the serial-slattern-diana-spencer-descended unfounded and malicious slanders and libels concerning Charles are just that:

Serial-slattern-diana-spencer-descended unfounded and malicious slanders and libels. [You may take the slattern from beneath the stairs but can never rid her bum of carpet burns]

While the other smarmy joker
Confesses he's a pooper poker.
26 posted on 11/09/2003 4:46:11 PM PST by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
In the words of Austin Powers, That's no woman that's a man baby.
27 posted on 11/09/2003 4:48:50 PM PST by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TrueBeliever9
The accusation is not against Prince Phillip in any way, shape, or form. The actual allegation is that Prince Charles was seen in bed with his servant, and it was told to Diana who recorded it. This really has nothing to do with his father.
28 posted on 11/09/2003 4:50:42 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Flashback: Sunday, 10 November, 2002

Royal aide denies rape claim
An aide to the Prince of Wales has denied allegations that he raped another male servant.

The statement issued by solicitors representing the man, who has not revealed his identity, follows the claims made by former royal valet George Smith.

The aide said Mr Smith was unreliable and accused him of changing his story.

Mr Smith, from Newport, south Wales, waived his right to anonymity by speaking to the Mail on Sunday newspaper about the alleged assault.

The 42-year-old Falklands veteran has also accused the Royal Family of a cover-up.

Tape recording

Details of the alleged rape of Mr Smith emerged following the collapse of the theft case against Paul Burrell, former butler to Diana, Princess of Wales.

During his trial it emerged the princess had kept a cassette tape containing details of a case of alleged male rape of one of Prince Charles' members of staff.


29 posted on 11/09/2003 4:51:32 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MissL; george wythe
<< Looks as if Ms Spencer may have the last word. >>

Dead, at thirty-three, at the hand of her Sonny-Goreleone-like Egyptian shopkeepr and cocaine-trafficer fornicator's drunken and drug-stupified henchman, as the consequence of her slovenly and serially-slatternly sexually abandoned lifestyle, I'm sure that will give her a great deal more satisfaction than she was able to free-load from her "life."
30 posted on 11/09/2003 4:52:45 PM PST by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
I actually had the occasion to meet the Prince. I was brought up in Australia, and my mother knew some Aussie blue-blood types who were invited to an exclusive opening of an art gallery depicting Australian artists: the event was to be opened by The Prince. It was strictly black tie, invitation only. This couple couldn't go so they gave their 2 tickets to my mother. My Dad was not interested.

So dressed to the nines, Mom and I attended this elitist do. I remember we had to wait for at least an hour behind a velvet cord before The Prince showed up. We could not enter the art gallery until he arrived. I was in the front row. He wasn't even 6 feet away from me, when he walked by. I remember shouting out something extremely polite such as: "Its good to see you, Sir". He pretended he did not hear me and walked into the gallery. After 5 minutes or so, the velvet barriers were removed, and we, the assembled waiting (about 100 of us) were granted access to the room.

There were wonderful examples of Australian art on the a wall; a huge banquet table with very expensive treats and no Prince. So we all just milled around, got a glass a wine, found something to eat, found an artist, congratulated him on his work and wondered if the Prince would ever return.

He finally did. He said a few bland words and immediately left. He made eye contact with no-one. It was so very surreal.

Many, many, many years later, I'm with Mr. Peel at a Republican Rally with guest, Dick Cheney. Mr. Peel pushed himself to the font of the line -- and said: "I've been waiting a long time to shake your hand, Sir". I saw Dick Cheney's face absolutely melt. There was intelligence in those eyes, there was warmth, there was a living breathing person there.

I never saw that with Prince Charles. And I got closer to him than Mr. Peel did with Dick Cheney.

Is The Prince gay? I honestly don’t have a glue. But I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he were.

31 posted on 11/09/2003 4:52:54 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
arrrgh!
NOT glue. clue.
Must proof read better. Must proof read better.
32 posted on 11/09/2003 4:55:18 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
This group seems to love to discredit anyone who has anything on the royal family by calling them drunks, or mental cases or both!

That dog might not hunt this time.

There is another servant who has accused Fawcett of rape.

If this scandal breaks full force, the fact the Prince Charles might be covering up for his alleged boyfriend's rapes would be disastrous.

33 posted on 11/09/2003 4:56:13 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
LOLOL......these people protest tooo much! Much tooo much!
34 posted on 11/09/2003 4:56:59 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 8mmMauser
The Man who would be Queen

ROFLMAO!

35 posted on 11/09/2003 4:58:11 PM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) (I've already given up on the Red Sox in 2004, just to save time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
I don't think he did it and is being slimed.
36 posted on 11/09/2003 4:59:39 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Am I mistaken but is it just possible that Diana is not the Queen of your Heart?
37 posted on 11/09/2003 5:05:32 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (You realize, of course, this means war?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
Just for you...

;-)

38 posted on 11/09/2003 5:08:11 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
In yet another videotape she apparently stated that Fawcett even put the toothpaste on Charles' toothbrush

Come on. Even Jeeves does that sort of thing. I don't know why fashionable Brits need a man to lay out their clothes, draw their baths, pack and unpack their valises, and so on; but there it is. That's what they do. You can't expect the Prince of Wales to squeeze his own toothpaste tube.

Still it must be said that Fawcett doesn't look much like Jeeves.

39 posted on 11/09/2003 5:17:58 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Although the "newsies" report these events as involving royals and commoners, an almost half-hearted genealogical search will discover that virtually ALL of the people who get within 100 feet of any of the royals are their cousins!

This stuff is "all in the family".

40 posted on 11/09/2003 5:18:21 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson