[sandlady]

Oh I've read it. We just have different methods of measuring truth I guess. I will not take bits and pieces of interviews and books printed by liberal media and use those pieces to trash a soldier of the USA. Obviously you will. Go for it!

BTW You read the part from this thread that says they're not even sure it's her, right?

[milemark]

"BTW You read the part from this thread that says they're not even sure it's her, right?"

Well, of course not, that might interfere with jumping to conclusions. It might also make sense. Can't have that.

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

[nmh]

"Oh I've read it. We just have different methods of measuring truth I guess. I will not take bits and pieces of interviews and books printed by liberal media and use those pieces to trash a soldier of the USA. Obviously you will. Go for it!"

Measuring truth? LOL! Truth is truth. Nothing to "measure". You don't want to acknowledge why the left loves Jessica. It's because they have common ground against Republicans and the military. It's hard to "measure" which the media loathes more - Republicans or the military. In any event, do continue to defend the left with your lame excuse of "measuring the truth" as your shield.

"BTW You read the part from this thread that says they're not even sure it's her, right?"

Other threads have clarified they were her. Again, maybe in your emotional torrent you didn't wish to see confirmation of this? Selective "measuring of truth"?

Try and have a lovely day.