Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/11/2003 12:08:27 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: dead
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
2 posted on 11/11/2003 12:09:18 PM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Gay, yes.

Metrosexual, no.
3 posted on 11/11/2003 12:10:08 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Maybe not, everyone knows that Elton John is the "other queen of england".
5 posted on 11/11/2003 12:11:51 PM PST by exile (Exile - Proudly ticking off the left since 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Would it matter to me?
No.
6 posted on 11/11/2003 12:15:11 PM PST by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
"...nowadays only hate-driven homophobes even consider hints about gay sexual activity to be any sort of a slur."

Certainly, it has nothing to do with manliness. Or the ability to lead a country.

7 posted on 11/11/2003 12:16:52 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I wouldn't be judgmental, if people weren't so STUPID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Would it matter if Prince Charles were gay?

Not to me, but then I've always thought he was a little queer in other ways. When one looks upon photo's of the mug of his paramour, Camilla Parker-Bowles, one thinks Charlie might do better if he were gay.

9 posted on 11/11/2003 12:20:45 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Since Prince Charles has made the choice to be a sodimite it should matter to the British that this kind of immorality is in their monarchy. Homosexuality is a choice, and there should be consequences for immoral acts.
10 posted on 11/11/2003 12:20:53 PM PST by Voteamerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Royalty Sucks!
12 posted on 11/11/2003 12:21:41 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Does Prince Charles matter?
13 posted on 11/11/2003 12:22:05 PM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
International Healing Foundation

CLICK HERE

14 posted on 11/11/2003 12:23:52 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
IMHO this is all a setup trying to force Chaz to give up his claim to the throne in favor of Wills. Too much baggage, and all that.
15 posted on 11/11/2003 12:24:16 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Hey, it didn't hurt the Roman Empire!
17 posted on 11/11/2003 12:24:37 PM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I, for one, would die of shock.
19 posted on 11/11/2003 12:24:49 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
But we know this already because we know about how he likes to have his toothpaste squeezed for him, his wee bottle held for him, and his elaborate set of transitional objects packed for him when he travels.

These revelations I feel to be more shocking and more indicative of an unattractive and unchecked neediness than the allegation that he may as an unmarried man with a tolerant girlfriend have submitted to a sexual act with an intimate employee.

I don’t know, I think buggering the help might be a little more shocking then having them squeeze your toothpaste for you.

Take two!


20 posted on 11/11/2003 12:26:19 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Who cares - It's amazing any of these inbred dinks can breath unassisted, let alone tie their own shoe laces.
O'Reilly embarassed himself last night going off on a tirade on this. friggin monarchs.
Ruck the Foyals!
21 posted on 11/11/2003 12:26:46 PM PST by tomakaze (Todays "useful idiot" is tomorrows "useless eater")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
To his proctologist I suppose. Other than that and his girl friend I can't imagine Europastad getting too miffed about it.
22 posted on 11/11/2003 12:26:58 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Would it matter if Prince Charles were gay?

Of course it would matter, because s/he would then be Princess Charlene !!! ;-))

.

24 posted on 11/11/2003 12:30:31 PM PST by GeekDejure (<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
,,, no mention in this article that whoever takes the throne is also head of the Church of England. Gay bishops could be ten a penny if Charlie's a soap dropper.
25 posted on 11/11/2003 12:31:18 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Well there had to be a reason why Princess Diana was a globe trotting slut who left her boys home to be raised by servants and maids.
26 posted on 11/11/2003 12:31:19 PM PST by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I thought they proved that he was the antichrist a few years back.
33 posted on 11/11/2003 12:39:49 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson