1 posted on
11/11/2003 12:08:27 PM PST by
dead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: dead
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
To: dead
Gay, yes.
Metrosexual, no.
3 posted on
11/11/2003 12:10:08 PM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: dead
Maybe not, everyone knows that Elton John is the "other queen of england".
5 posted on
11/11/2003 12:11:51 PM PST by
exile
(Exile - Proudly ticking off the left since 1992.)
To: dead
Would it matter to me?
No.
6 posted on
11/11/2003 12:15:11 PM PST by
R. Scott
To: dead
"...nowadays only hate-driven homophobes even consider hints about gay sexual activity to be any sort of a slur."Certainly, it has nothing to do with manliness. Or the ability to lead a country.
7 posted on
11/11/2003 12:16:52 PM PST by
NicknamedBob
(I wouldn't be judgmental, if people weren't so STUPID!)
To: dead
Would it matter if Prince Charles were gay?Not to me, but then I've always thought he was a little queer in other ways. When one looks upon photo's of the mug of his paramour, Camilla Parker-Bowles, one thinks Charlie might do better if he were gay.
9 posted on
11/11/2003 12:20:45 PM PST by
elbucko
To: dead
Since Prince Charles has made the choice to be a sodimite it should matter to the British that this kind of immorality is in their monarchy. Homosexuality is a choice, and there should be consequences for immoral acts.
To: dead
Royalty Sucks!
12 posted on
11/11/2003 12:21:41 PM PST by
per loin
To: dead
Does Prince Charles matter?
To: All
14 posted on
11/11/2003 12:23:52 PM PST by
Cindy
To: dead
IMHO this is all a setup trying to force Chaz to give up his claim to the throne in favor of Wills. Too much baggage, and all that.
15 posted on
11/11/2003 12:24:16 PM PST by
r9etb
To: dead
Hey, it didn't hurt the Roman Empire!
17 posted on
11/11/2003 12:24:37 PM PST by
HHFi
To: dead
I, for one, would die of shock.
19 posted on
11/11/2003 12:24:49 PM PST by
Askel5
To: All
But we know this already because we know about how he likes to have his toothpaste squeezed for him, his wee bottle held for him, and his elaborate set of transitional objects packed for him when he travels.
These revelations I feel to be more shocking and more indicative of an unattractive and unchecked neediness than the allegation that he may as an unmarried man with a tolerant girlfriend have submitted to a sexual act with an intimate employee.
I dont know, I think buggering the help might be a little more shocking then having them squeeze your toothpaste for you.
Take two!
20 posted on
11/11/2003 12:26:19 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
Who cares - It's amazing any of these inbred dinks can breath unassisted, let alone tie their own shoe laces.
O'Reilly embarassed himself last night going off on a tirade on this. friggin monarchs.
Ruck the Foyals!
21 posted on
11/11/2003 12:26:46 PM PST by
tomakaze
(Todays "useful idiot" is tomorrows "useless eater")
To: dead
To his proctologist I suppose. Other than that and his girl friend I can't imagine Europastad getting too miffed about it.
22 posted on
11/11/2003 12:26:58 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: dead
Would it matter if Prince Charles were gay?Of course it would matter, because s/he would then be Princess Charlene !!! ;-))
.
24 posted on
11/11/2003 12:30:31 PM PST by
GeekDejure
(<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
To: dead
,,, no mention in this article that whoever takes the throne is also head of the Church of England. Gay bishops could be ten a penny if Charlie's a soap dropper.
To: dead
Well there had to be a reason why Princess Diana was a globe trotting slut who left her boys home to be raised by servants and maids.
26 posted on
11/11/2003 12:31:19 PM PST by
funkywbr
To: dead
I thought they proved that he was the antichrist a few years back.
33 posted on
11/11/2003 12:39:49 PM PST by
Consort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson