[goldstategop]

So much for private property rights. This law is unconstitutional. The owner should get a lawyer and sue to have it overturned.

[Prime Choice]

So much for private property rights. This law is unconstitutional. The owner should get a lawyer and sue to have it overturned.

Amen to that! Why doesn't the city spend its time and money going after criminals instead of lawful property owners. Sheesh!!

[Moonman62]

So much for private property rights. This law is unconstitutional. The owner should get a lawyer and sue to have it overturned.

If the color of the house wasn't visible beyond the property line, then you'd have a point.

[Libertina]

Agreed. The neighbors may not like this, but they should pay attention to their own property.

[Rebelbase]

We have a guy in my town who painted his house purple pokadots and lined is front yard with toilet bowels as a protest against the city council.

Everytime I go by there I hope to see that one of his neighbor's would have taken a slegehammer to the toilets, but its not happened.

Maybe one will sue him for causing the property values to drop.

[Cultural Jihad]

This law is unconstitutional.

Under what grounds, counselor? Suppose someone decides to have an abattoir business in the neighborhood, and cattle trucks come and go down your street at all hours, and the carcasses pile up on his front lawn awaiting butchering. Are zoning laws deemed 'unconstitutional,' too?

The man was given three years to comply with the ordinance. Considering that no one forced him to purchase a home where such laws are established, that seems more than fair.