Why does Michele Dyson talk about an angry, bitter hack like MacGruder months after the fact?
Why does Michele Dyson talk about an angry, bitter hack like MacGruder months after the fact? (from the article)
"In discussions about the comic strip, people would ask me whether I thought the series was humorous comment poking fun at serious events in government or whether I saw it as cheap shot using sexism as the weapon of attack.
The topic still is coming up, even now, almost a month later, so I decided to give it some "back of the envelope" figuring."
For the same reason Dvorkin
wrote about Terry Gross' interview of Bill O'Reilly long after the fact. Because enough people disagreed with what the media outlet did, and complained about it, that it elicited -- even necessitated -- a response. That's a good practice.