A Troubling Influence - An Islamic Fifth Column penetrates the White House

FrontPageMagazine ^ | 12/09/03 | Frank J Gaffney Jr.

[Poohbah]

If he doesn't explain himself, be he once banned, using multiple handles, or is involved with the story, pay him no mind-- not that you were.

Even when he lobs abusive FReepmail at me?

[Sabertooth]

Trollstomper signed up 12/11/03 and has only posted on this thread.

If he doesn't explain himself, be he once banned, using multiple handles, or is involved with the story, pay him no mind-- not that you were.

Hey supersleuth, read the posts on this thread, and you'll know which of the options you've presented is in the bullseye.

Yeah, he's explained that he's involved with the story, which would mean that he has first-hand information. Not that you'd want that.

[JohnGalt]

Again, he signed up 12/11/03 and this is the only thread he has posted on--click name and find in forum.

I invite him to post something like: "I was so moved by this Gaffney piece that I happened to find when I stumbled on this web site, FreeRepublic, that I had to keep posting over 6 days on this one thread"

Ya sure you betcha.

[JohnGalt]

Ahh man, you outed him on 12.11.

I am late to this thread indeed.

[Sabertooth]

Why don't you just pour yourself a nice warm cuppa STFU?

What a guy, always sharing.

I figured you'd decloak, eventually.

[Poohbah]

I have little tolerance for idiots, particularly when they are lording their self-proclaimed superior knowledge and intellectual acumen over others.

[Sabertooth]

I have little tolerance for idiots, particularly when they are lording their self-proclaimed superior knowledge and intellectual acumen over others.

Sounds like you have adequacy issues.

Still one of the tops on the unintended irony department, though, so be at peace.

[Poohbah]

Sounds like you have adequacy issues.

No, just issues with everyone else's inadequacy.

t takes a lot more work for me to go soaring with the eagles, because there are so many frickin' turkeys in this world.

[FreeReign]

Yeah, he's explained that he's involved with the story, which would mean that he has first-hand information. Not that you'd want that.

People with first-hand information and who claim to be involved with a story should identify themselves else why should we believe their first-hand accounts.

Especially when they claim to be a named source in the WP.

[aristeides]

Do I have to point out to you the obvious fact that somebody who identifies himself exposes himself to retaliation?

[FreeReign]

People with first-hand information and who claim to be involved with a story should identify themselves else why should we believe their first-hand accounts.

Do I have to point out to you the obvious fact that somebody who identifies himself exposes himself to retaliation?

Gee no kidding? I never said otherwise.

Now, do I have to point out to you the obvious fact that somebody who doesn't identify himself can give any first hand account they want -- without being held responsible for the accuracy of what they say?

[Fred Mertz]

I have little tolerance for idiots, particularly when they are lording their self-proclaimed superior knowledge and intellectual acumen over others.

This one's a keeper coming from you, oh pompous one.

Trollstomper mopped the floor with all of you Norquist sycophants and you can't handle that he's a newbie. LOL

[Pelham]

Funny how some people feel threatened by a little website. Got to keep those dangerous opinions from being examined...

[Pelham]

Again, he signed up 12/11/03 and this is the only thread he has posted on--

I don't think it's all that mysterious. Trollstomper told me that he's only been here because he's been home sick for a few days, and that FR isn't something he normally devotes time to. He's obviously involved in this story in some manner. Maybe he's Gaffney, lol. Somewhere on the thread he said that his initial interest was simply to find out what Grover's supporters are saying regarding this controversy.

[secretagent]

mark

[Betty Jo]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/527633/posts

Oh, my, read all the DATES of the posts!

[nopardons]

I thought that you were going to beddy bys.

Read the dates of the posts ? The thread was poste on December 8, 2003. So, that's when the posts began. There is NO significance to nine days ago.

The stuff about Grover, has been up and running for at least a YEAR , right here on FR, so Horowitz is a Johnny come lately.

And, old girl, your brain, what little there is of it, is fried; go do what you claimed you were about to ... GO TO BED !

[Betty Jo]

You are reading something wrong,this link is to the Clinton-Alamoudi article if you go to my comments.

[Betty Jo]

You are reading something wrong,this link is to the Clinton-Alamoudi article if you go to my comments.

[nopardons]

I'm NOT reading your links at all. LOL

You're rather like the boy who cried wolf...you post so much garbage, that when you don't, no one pays any attention.

See what happens to uncredible posters ? :-)