To: hchutch
Show the evidence that the war effort has been harmed, and that wrongdoing by Norauist was a factor, and I'll discuss it further.
Quite an unserious proposal. Norquist is up to his ears in terror symps. Why? Or rather, why don't you want to know why?
|
127 posted on
12/09/2003 6:52:50 PM PST by
Sabertooth
(Credit where it's due: saveourlicense.com prevented SB60, and the Illegal Alien CDLs... for now.)
To: Sabertooth; Poohbah; Bob J
You do not have proof of harm to the war effort, do you?
So, let me ask the only logical question: Why are you engaging in the same sort of twisted logic that Tom Foley used to justify a taxpayer-funded fishing expedition over wildly implausible charges from Gary Sick?
133 posted on
12/09/2003 7:46:17 PM PST by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: Sabertooth
Grover is on the take, and like all too may DC conservatives, on the make.The times require that sort of thing to be checked at the door where national security is involved, and he of all people, should understand that, but he can't grasp that Gaffney's objections are strictly "business".Norquist pimped for Microsoft, but if he is at all supect on continuing Islamist connections, well, screw him.Send him over the gangplank.
He has used that goodwill to spread fear among DC conservatives, but he isn't that important, or needed, when at root, he is a hired gun, no more, no less.He ought to be dumped and if his Muslim block goes with him, so be it.They are too fickle to be counted on if so.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson