[Sabertooth]

You do not have proof of harm to the war effort, do you?

Read the article.

There's plenty of evidence of attempts to do just that.

Did the espionage of the Moslem chaplains at Gitmo harm the war effort?

We don't even know if the interrogations of many of the Al Qaeda prisoners were translated properly.

So, let me ask the only logical question:

The only logical question is why you're insisting that America be harmed so badly that even you'd have to concede the point before you'd be willing to investigate Grover Norquist's efforts to provide high level access to Islamic Fifth Columnists.

Read the article. It's chock full of specifics about Norquists Islamist ties, with footnotes, not a single one of which you've had the intellectual honesty to address or attempt to rebut.

[hchutch]

I read it. I do not see any proof of harm to the war effort. I also think you are also being intellectually dishonest. You theorize about POSSIBLE harm due to what happened at Guanatanmo Bay. What did Grover Norquist have to do with selecting the translators and chaplains? How does have that sort of decision-making power?

Once again, why are you using the twisted logic that Tom Foley used to justify a taxpayer-funded fishing expedition over the extremely dubious claims (to put it charitably) made by Gary Sick?

I am beginning to think that Bob J's assessment of you earlier in this thread appears to be correct.