[JohnGalt]

That is about what I expected him to say.

Keep in mind, I am coming from the perspective that everyone in Washington is corrupt, even as I think Gaffney is more corrupt than Norquist who at least as some wins for the cause. I do disagree with Norquist 'easy entry' policies, however.

Funny, someone pressed the abuse button on my 703; I think I outed Gaffney as a Boeing Stooge and linked to Sailer's VDARE article.

Wonder who pulled the trigger on the abuse button?

Yours in liberty and props for fighting the good fight on this thread. A friend in need and all that...

[Poohbah]

Funny, someone pressed the abuse button on my 703; I think I outed Gaffney as a Boeing Stooge and linked to Sailer's VDARE article.

As someone who is in agreement with you on this issue, the fact that you cited a VDARE article annoys me immensely. JimRob, for his own (and, IMNHO, very good) reasons, does not want VDARE links.

[Trollstomper]

I think I outed Gaffney as a Boeing Stooge ...



Oh you did? Whoopy. Deal with #710 in a factual manner and rejoin the real world.

[EverFree]

Like I said, blaming Norquist & W for not stopping 911 and calling it "allowing" is pretty thin gruel. Sailor makes the remark offhand and doesn't press it.

I suggest avoiding questionable vdare links so no one can paint you as a "bush allowed it" type via abuse button.

Stick to solid Dirty Gaffney evidence and you're untouchable!

[Sabertooth]

Funny, someone pressed the abuse button on my 703; I think I outed Gaffney as a Boeing Stooge and linked to Sailer's VDARE article.

vDare's a mixed bag, but I'd just as soon the link stayed, myself. Yours wasn't the first post to link to Sailor's article at vDare that's been nuked on this thread, see this deleted post.

Not everything is a conspiracy.