[hchutch]

Well, I don't consider myself a cultural conservative - if anything, my views on a number of issues are closer to Grover Norquist's than Pat Buchanan's.

I sometimes get the impression that cultural conservatives consider folks like me to be heretics or worse.

[rmlew]

You don't get it.
I support Free-markets. However, Norquist has been blidned by the universalist belef that everyone is ready to be a Jeffersonian.
He fails to see culture or religion. The Islamists don't want to be like America. They want to control America.

[Sabertooth]

if anything, my views on a number of issues are closer to Grover Norquist's than Pat Buchanan's.

Forget Buchanan, he hasn't been relevent for a decade.

What about David Horowitz?

What about Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson?

What about Frank Gaffney?

What about some of the other folks Gaffney cites?

My beef has never been a personal one with Grover Norquist, as should be obvious from the data assembled in this article which comes from many sources, all of them reputable and unchallenged on the facts.Rather, my concern is with a far larger, Islamist enterprise in this country that has achieved, particularly over the past ten years, considerable success in creating the makings of a Saudi-funded Fifth Column in America. This point has been recognized by a number of the most thoughtful and influential conservative commentators of our day, including Cal Thomas, Mona Charen, Michelle Malkin, Kenneth Timmerman; David Frum and David Keene.

That's a good mix of paleos, neos, paleoneos, neopaleos, and all such sundry permutations of conservatism.