Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
Again, I do not see anything in the First Amendment that states Islam is not covered under the part about "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;".

Recently there has been certainly one case, perhaps several, where a "religion" was deemed illegal (animal sacrifices, etc.) and not subject to Constitutional protection.

To me, islam satisfies all the requirements to be treated in identically the same manner. That no exceptions are possible is simply not true.

93 posted on 12/09/2003 11:15:49 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
Would you care to cite those cases?

Certainly those who use religion as a shield to commit crimes should be punished, but I fail to see how those who peaceably practice any religion should face any interference from the government.

Or are you saying some religions are more equal than others?
97 posted on 12/09/2003 11:27:30 AM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson