To: RosieCotton
Would you really want a man dumb enough to expose himself to the potential for indentured servitude that is American Family Law?
29 posted on
12/11/2003 8:46:47 AM PST by
Vidi_Vici_Vinnny
(An armed man is a Citizen. An unarmed man is a Subject.)
To: Vidi_Vici_Vinnny
My last post goes for you, too.
To: Vidi_Vici_Vinnny
I consider myself *smart* enough to have recognised a terrific lady and make the commitment to her. If I didn't, someone else would.
Odd that the whole 'no commitment for men, just sex with no strings attached' philosopy has popped up here of all places. I would have thought that was a '70s 'me-first' liberal philosophy.
44 posted on
12/11/2003 9:06:28 AM PST by
blowfish
To: Vidi_Vici_Vinnny
I consider myself *smart* enough to have recognised a terrific lady and make the commitment to her. If I didn't, someone else would.
Odd that the whole 'no commitment for men, just sex with no strings attached' philosopy has popped up here of all places. I would have thought that was a '70s 'me-first' liberal philosophy.
45 posted on
12/11/2003 9:06:47 AM PST by
blowfish
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson