Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: puroresu
[P]robably assuming O'Connor would join the three judges who almost always obey the Constitution (Thomas, Scalia, and Rehnquist) and the one who sometimes does (Kennedy) in striking the bill down.

What is the line about assumptions? They make an a** ... You nailed it on the justices.

But it's almost as if she feels she needs to "atone" for her vote to help President Bush, which infuriated the radical left. Ever since then, she's been a reliable leftist vote, not the swing vote she once was.

Bingo again. I think she's been leaning to the dark side for a while.

15 posted on 12/12/2003 7:47:15 AM PST by 4CJ ('Scots vie 4 tavern juices' - anagram by paulklenk, 22 Nov 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
"I think she's been leaning to the dark side for a while."

If Bush had any advisors around him that were worth a damn, he would have known there was little chance of the court doing the right thing.

19 posted on 12/12/2003 7:53:59 AM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson