[half_nelson]

I thought dems were against fighting...

Furthermore, isn't it mean to shout- what about those who are hard of hearing?

So much discrimination...

[NutCrackerBoy]

I heared on the raddieu that Dean pledged to make terrorism and WMDs his top priority if elected.

My thoughts: now we're getting somewhere. Not that I truly think Dean has a clue, but that this is the way 2004 could become a real election.

The liberals have consistently said they would go specifically after Al Qaeda; they would not conflate the War on Terrorism with the issues of "states of concern". If the American people really believe that would be more effective, they can vote the Dems into office. Good luck.

[cubreporter]

oh yes, they are against fighting except when it is something THEY want.

They are against YOUR FREE SPEECH but are comfy with their own.

They are against big money EXCEPT in their own bank accounts.

They are against hatred EXCEPT when it comes from them. They can be the nastiest people on God's green earth. They have proven that over and over and over again.

They are losers all beginning with bill, hillereee and on down the line. Joe Lieberman is proving to be the best and nicest candidate but even he leaves questions now and then...but he's the one that has some goodness in him.