Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican set to beatify emperor
BBC ^ | Sunday, 21 December, 2003, 00:20 GMT | BBC

Posted on 12/21/2003 1:07:42 PM PST by Jake_the_Snake_Roberts

Vatican set to beatify emperor

The Pope recognised Charles I's "heroic virtues" last year Pope John Paul II is to beatify the last emperor of the Austro-Hungarian empire, Charles I, after recognising a miracle attributed to him. The Vatican gave no details, but the miracle was said to be related to the case of a Brazilian nun who was cured of a deadly disease.

Beatification is the penultimate step before sainthood. For actual sainthood, proof of another miracle is required.

Charles I sat on the throne of the now defunct empire between 1916 and 1918.

No date has been set for the beatification.

Last Habsburg ruler

"He (Charles I) served his people with justice and charity," said the Vatican Congregation for the Causes of Saints on Saturday.

BEATIFICATION Beatification requires that a miracle has occurred Group approaches local bishop After Rome's approval an investigation is launched Findings are sent to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints Case is presented to the Pope Blessed may be accorded a feast day Relics of the candidate may be venerated Canonisation (Actual sainthood ) requires proof of a second miracle

"He sought peace, helped the poor, cultivated a spiritual life with commitment," the statement added.

The Vatican launched the emperor on the path to sainthood in April 2002, when Pope John Paul II formally recognised his "heroic virtues".

After that, Vatican experts sought to formally verify claims of the miracle.

The reported miracle happened when the Brazilian nun was cured of a deadly disease after praying for Charles I's beatification, the emperor's grandson George Habsburg told the Hungarian Catholic Uj Ember last year.

The last Habsburg emperor became heir to the throne after his uncle, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated in Sarajevo in 1914 - an event that triggered World War I.

Charles I was unable to stop the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian empire and abdicated in 1918.

He went into exile and died on the Portuguese island of Madeira in the Atlantic in 1922 at the age of 34.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beatification; catholicchurch; charlesi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: stripes1776
"Isn't canonization the last step before sainthood?"

I looked at it as canonization was sainthood, therefore it wasn't a step *before* sainthood.
21 posted on 12/23/2003 5:57:20 AM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jake_the_Snake_Roberts
Charles I sat on the throne of the now defunct empire between 1916 and 1918.

The Beeb's breathtaking grasp of the obvious.

22 posted on 12/23/2003 6:00:15 AM PST by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
Alas, Wilhelm II has been singled out as 'scapegoat #1' for the Great War, with all of his good qualities ignored and all of his shortcomings magnified to absurd proportions.

I do not think the soon-to-be Blessed Kaiser Karl I was willing to sacrifice Germany for Austria, he could see where this war was going and urged Germany to give up Elsass-Lothringen, for which he would compensate them with territory of his own--better to lose a province than the whole empire after all. In fact, he was about the only world leader willing to concede in the name of peace.

However, that being said, I have bored many an individual with my explanation that Wilhelm II was not being entirely obstinate, but simply more realistic than his Austrian kamerad (though as half-English obstinancy was in his nature). Karl I suffered from a common disorder of the saintly: his purity inhibited him from seeing the impurity of others. He deserves every honor for his heartfelt desire to make peace, but Wilhelm II realized that the Allies were bent on nothing less than their total annihilation and that any attempt to negotiate only served to show that the Central Powers were become desperate.

Wilhelm II (like Franz Josef) was simply out-of-date. He still believed a monarch was answerable to God rather than politicians or ever shifting popular opinion.

Gott Erhalte Unser Kaiser!
23 posted on 01/05/2004 12:20:22 AM PST by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: royalcello

Hey Im related to Hapsburgs thrice over and am happy
to see this.


24 posted on 09/28/2004 4:42:17 PM PDT by Selkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: royalcello

Amen, amen!


25 posted on 09/28/2004 4:46:17 PM PDT by AMDG&BVMH (Proudly served in the National Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen

"Italy's and Russia's had been despicable."

Don't forget Russia's ally, France -- without whom she would not have moved . . .


26 posted on 09/28/2004 4:49:33 PM PDT by AMDG&BVMH (Proudly served in the National Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Beatification is the penultimate step in the canonization process. There it is fixed. First Dan Rather, now the BBC. You have been blogged--bow down.
27 posted on 09/28/2004 4:54:31 PM PDT by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AMDG&BVMH
One expects despicable conduct from the (republican) French. But Savoy and Romanov should have known better.

For the longest time, Russian ambassadors were forbidden to offer respects at the playing of la Marseillaise because it had been the theme song of the regicides of the Revolution. But all that changed once the Russians decided that they would co-operate with the Jacobins against their former allies, Germany and Austria-Hungary.

The Crimean War should have demonstrated the true intentions of the English and French. Tsar Nicholas was far too trusting of these western scoundrels, and his trust was repaid by the refusal of the English to grant him asylum, even after Kaiser Wilhelm's government had agreed to give the Romanovs free passage through Germany after the revolution.

28 posted on 09/28/2004 6:02:09 PM PDT by Goetz_von_Berlichingen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Selkie
I'm related to Hapsburgs thrice over

Really? How? (If you don't want to post your genealogical information publicly, please send me a private message.)

29 posted on 09/29/2004 11:00:02 AM PDT by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson