Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
Seems to me the answer is simple. Run China under a bi-chameral form of government; one house commie, on house demo. At some point the democratic way would start to turn the commies to their side, or nothing would ever get done because no agreement could be reached.
6 posted on 12/22/2003 1:10:10 AM PST by Nachoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Nachoman
The "one China" policy is a sham. Formosa was a part of the Japanese domain until the end of WW II. Chiang Kia Shek fled with his followers to Formosa after being defeated in the Chinese civil war. Since then it has been renamed Tiawan. The fact remains that China has never owned the island of Formosa or Tiawan.

China with the people of Tiawan would be similar to the Confederates that emigrated to the Argentine after the civil war giving us the duty to invade and capture Agentina. China's aim is aggression, pure and simple, to punish the people of Tiawan for not accepting the communist way of life. Any other representation is false and a blow against freedom.

7 posted on 12/22/2003 1:59:06 AM PST by meenie (Remember the Alamo! Alamo! One more time. Alamo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson