Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe
This isn't against you personally, but whoever wrote this: "Private land ownership ... contributes to social injustice.... Public control of land use is therefore indispensable." is being deceptive. This sentence could easily read:

Private land ownership in some countries rests in the hands of a tiny elite, leaving 99% of the population with no opportunity to own land. This sort of situation, common in many countries, contributes to social injustice and political instability. At times these nations engage in land redistribution schemes but the benificiaries of these plans are ill-equipped to manage the land on their own. In this instance, temporary public control of land use is indespensible.

Whoever wrote this should have used the whole quote. I'm no lover of the UN, but proponents of UN disbanding should be honest.

48 posted on 12/23/2003 4:09:25 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: jjm2111
In this instance, temporary public control of land use is indespensible.

That all depends on the nature of the 'public agency' in question. Given the UNs preference for totalitarian regimes and brutal dictatorships, (yes, I said PREFERENCE) that proposition is a load of crap.

50 posted on 12/23/2003 4:22:17 AM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** Freedom is messy, but that's because individuals are different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111; Beck_isright; bulldogs
Beck_isright, "Every time you vote Demipublican or Republicrat, you endorse the UN. Think about it."

"The U.N. Convention to Combat Desertification was ratified by the U.S. Senate on October 18, but few Senators yet know that it has been ratified. Senator Craig Thomas (R-WY) introduced a package of 34 treaties, all of which were ratified by a show of hands -- no recorded vote.

Just the fact that Bush wants the UN to "help out" in Iraq should be enough to scare you into not voting for his re-election!

52 posted on 12/23/2003 5:15:23 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Who cares what it could read, how about what it does read! 30 seconds on google yields:

That was a correct use of an elipses because it did not change the original message, it only condensed it to make it easier to read.
137 posted on 12/30/2003 1:20:23 PM PST by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson