Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Al-Qaida's second breath (Al Qaeda, Pakistan, Saudi) -- IMPORTANT INFO)
UPI ^ | Dec. 26, 2003 | Claude Salhani

Posted on 12/27/2003 3:03:02 PM PST by FairOpinion

WASHINGTON, Dec. 26 (UPI) -- The two recent failed attempts on the life on Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, the heightened terror threat-level in the United States and the scare over trans-Atlantic airline hijackings on Christmas Day are obvious indications that al-Qaida is alive and well, and clearly engaged on a second major offensive.

Following their ouster from Afghanistan by U.S. forces in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, Osama bin Laden's group was forced to flee its strongholds, abandoning training camps and safe houses. But by now they have had ample time to catch their breath, regroup, reassess and plan their next steps, which now appears to be unfolding.

Al-Qaida's strategy, it would seem, is being implemented on three separate fronts. The first is to strike at targets of opportunity, such as U.S. military and forces associated with them in Iraq. The presence of thousands of U.S. troops concentrated in and around Baghdad and other Iraqi localities makes that job all the easier for them. Infiltrating Iraq through its long and porous frontiers with Turkey, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran further facilitates that task for al-Qaida jihadis.

Furthermore, recruiting cashiered former Iraqi military personnel in dire need of cash, ready and willing to carry out attacks against U.S. forces simplifies the task for al-Qaida operatives in Iraq. Identifying and conscripting people willing to kill Americans in exchange for money in post-Saddam Iraq should not be a terribly difficult task given the circumstances.

Al-Qaida's second front seems to be centered on Pakistan. There are a number of reasons why that country has become of prime importance to bin Laden and his acolytes. First, is its proximity to Afghanistan, from where many al-Qaida operatives fled during the U.S. offensive to oust them and the Taliban. Second, al-Qaida, just as their Taliban brethren, find enormous sympathy and support in Pakistan, not only among the population at large, but also within the military. In Pakistan, bin Laden is considered a national hero and thousands of mothers have named their sons after him.

The last two assassination attempts on Musharraf's life -- the seventh and eighth since he took power in 1999 -- would also indicate that al-Qaida is intent on overthrowing the Pakistani president. Musharraf is despised by many for the about-face he adopted vis-à-vis the Taliban, abandoning them and siding with the United States in the war on terror. Not least of those who dislike him are prominent officers in the ISI, Pakistan's influential intelligence service.

Overthrowing Musharraf and assuming power in Pakistan would accomplish two objectives for the jihadis. First, it would replace Afghanistan, giving them a "legitimate" base of operations -- something they lack at the moment. It would give them a tremendous power-base with almost unlimited human resources to choose from, when compared to Afghanistan. Pakistan's population is made up of 150 million, of which, by Musharraf' own account, one percent -- or 150,000 people -- share the extremist views of al-Qaida and bin Laden.

But of far greater importance is the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear power and the country falling into the hands of the jihadis would make bin Laden a nuclear power -- far more dangerous than a group of fanatic skyjackers armed with Islamist fervor, box cutters and determination.

The Islamists' third front is, of course, Saudi Arabia. This, in fact, has been and remains bin Laden's original objective. Bin Laden intends to overthrow the House of Saud, which he sees as corrupt, and in the process take over the immense richness of Saudi's oil production -- the world's first provider of black gold. The turmoil that has gripped the kingdom in 2003 -- bombings and attacks -- is only the beginning. Look for more terrorist actions meant to undermine the royal family in the year to come.

Bin Laden sees the United States -- the sole remaining super power -- as one of the few, if not the only impediment to his grandiose dreams of establishing an Islamist caliphate that would stretch from southwest Asia, to the Arabian peninsula, the former Soviet republics and beyond.

U.S. support of Musharraf and the Saudi royal family exacerbates the jihadis' hate of the United States, and in the course any harm they can cause to the United States -- at home or abroad -- they see as an added bonus in their ongoing struggle.

Should he accomplish his objectives, with a finger on a nuclear trigger and control over the world's vastest supply of oil, bin Laden would greatly change the present world order.


TOPICS: Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; alqaida; caliphate; clashofcivilizations; islamofascist; musharraf; newworldorder; orangealert4; osamabinladen; pakistan; sharia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
"But of far greater importance is the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear power and the country falling into the hands of the jihadis would make bin Laden a nuclear power"

Should he accomplish his objectives, with a finger on a nuclear trigger and control over the world's vastest supply of oil, bin Laden would greatly change the present world order."

1 posted on 12/27/2003 3:03:03 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JustPiper; Cindy
Ping
2 posted on 12/27/2003 3:03:44 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I wouldn't give a plug nickel for Musharraf's life at this point. No way would the U.S. allow them to take over Pakistan
3 posted on 12/27/2003 3:07:55 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
We will not allow those nukes to fall into AQ's hands..
4 posted on 12/27/2003 3:10:07 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
If Mushie is assassinated, the full extent of WoT will go into full gear.
5 posted on 12/27/2003 3:12:44 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (Nothing is as expensive as a free government service or subsidized benefit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
No way would India allow bin Laden & company to take over Pakistan.
6 posted on 12/27/2003 3:13:12 PM PST by irish_lad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog
But what could we do then? Do we know where the Pak Nukes are so that we can bomb them?
7 posted on 12/27/2003 3:15:35 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Should he accomplish his objectives, with a finger on a nuclear trigger and control over the world's vastest supply of oil, bin Laden would greatly change the present world order."

FairOpinion, that has been my greatest fear since 9/11.

8 posted on 12/27/2003 3:18:02 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
I hope to hell we have an approved battle plan for Pakistan that does not involve the united nations or europoean allies in the event we must destroy it (islamopsycho government and sympathizers, that is).
9 posted on 12/27/2003 3:18:18 PM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Pakistan's population is made up of 150 million, of which, by Musharraf' own account, one percent -- or 150,000 people -- share the extremist views of al-Qaida and bin Laden.

One percent of 150 million is 1.5 million.

10 posted on 12/27/2003 3:21:16 PM PST by Comus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Ditto your #8.
11 posted on 12/27/2003 3:21:39 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
My greatest fear since 9/11 is that people would forget what it was like during 9/11.

Judging from the actions and attitudes of the anti-American Leftists in this nation, my fears have been realized.

I sat down and watched "In Memoriam" last night. I think it should be required viewing for anyone who criticizes our War on Terrorism.

12 posted on 12/27/2003 3:23:28 PM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Comus
It's most likely the article's author who can't do math. I tend to believe the M. 1% figure of 1.5 M.
13 posted on 12/27/2003 3:23:28 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Should he accomplish his objectives, with a finger on a nuclear trigger and control over the world's vastest supply of oil, bin Laden would greatly change the present world order.

I continue to believe that the dissolution of West Pakistan is of urgent national importance.

Failing this, I am certain that Pakistan's nuclear weapons would not survive five minutes after an Islamist takeover.

OBL, if he is still alive, cannot run Pakistan from a cave. The minute he shows a hair on his head, he is a dead man.

Pakistan is our largest security problem now, and I hope our guys are on the case.

14 posted on 12/27/2003 3:23:36 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I'm currently reading The New Jackals, written in 1999, pre-9/11.

The flyleaf of the book mentions the growing relationship between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden.

The book confirms OBL's desire to take a state; they would like to take down the Family of Saud but realize it's unlikely. Pakistan is his next target, and it has been for years.
15 posted on 12/27/2003 3:26:30 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
The Indians and the Russians would beat us to it.
16 posted on 12/27/2003 3:27:12 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
But what could we do then? Do we know where the Pak Nukes are so that we can bomb them?

East of the Tigris,
West of the Ganges

17 posted on 12/27/2003 3:27:16 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
But what could we do then? Do we know where the Pak Nukes are so that we can bomb them?

If we don't know where they are, and don't have a contingency plan to seize or destroy them, someone in the Pentagon has not been doing his job.

18 posted on 12/27/2003 3:27:20 PM PST by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Hint: They are in Pakistan.
19 posted on 12/27/2003 3:28:22 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The Muslim jihad will be fulfilled once they have possesion of a nuke, which they will--and they will use it. It's part of the Qur'an. Jihad is the most sacred tenet of Islam. Jihad means to kill all non-Muslims. That's what they believe. That's what they are fixin' to do.
20 posted on 12/27/2003 3:29:38 PM PST by jolie560
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson