I'm not arguing semantics, I'm asking for clarification, which you continuously avoid as if you know your chart is either misleading or a lie.
If you want to present yourself as a liar, fine by me, all I asked is what is "Human Resources" compared to social spending. You used the plot to make a point concerning social spending, yet avoid backing up that the plot refers to Human Resources instead of social spending. THat ain't semantics, that critical questioning - something you appear unwilling to address.
Also, I never said I personally approved of everything the President has done while in office. I have taken the very entrenched position that it is much better now than if Gore had been there, and will be better than any democrat elected to office.
I do not debate on a micro level. It is a losing game and a waste of time on FR.
I'm not asking for micro-level information, just simple honesty about the "factual plot" you provided. The fact that you want to continue to avoid the question leads me to believe you are either hiding somthing or are either stupid enough to be sucked in by a pretty picture or a plain and simple liar.
Looking back, I should have not even posted the chart. Any proof I post will be refuted anyway, regardless of merit.
Yeah, you probably shouldn't have. Especially if you can't explain the difference between human resources (title of the plot) and social spending (subject of your rants).
Please come back when you get a clue...