Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: msmagoo
>> Demers said the 2nd District Court of Appeal recently ruled Terri's Law is presumptively unconstitutional.

Terri's right to be represented in legal proceedings that affect her is not at issue and should not be overruled by judicial fiat. This judge is prejudiced in the extreme and should be removed not just from the case but from the bench. He is unfit to serve.

39 posted on 01/12/2004 11:50:44 AM PST by T'wit (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's compulsory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit; All
The root of the rot, as I see it, is that the appeals court holds all previous legal findings to be beyond reproach. Demers says Terri's Law is 'presumptively unconstitutional' based on Felo's one-sided argument (at the time Demers made the comment he had not even read Bush's response) and the Appeals Court consistently rubber-stamps Demers and Greer, compounding the errors instead of correcting them!

MS, the jerk, is assumed to be the perfect caring hubby, only looking out for his wife's best interests despite the overwhelming evidence offered to the contrary.

Of course if the evidence showing his numerous conflicts of interests and outright perjury were allowed in as evidence, the situation would be different.

But, in an amazing disply of see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, the overwhelming evidence of conflict of interest and evidence indicating MS suppressed evidence of trauma and abuse (in the malpractice trial) has been IGNORED and disregarded by the court - yet the judges claim they've followed the law and Terri must die - and their rulings based on false, incomplete and misleading evidence are upheld!

The evidence proving he is an unfit guardian has not been heard by Greer and yet the march to withdraw the feeding tube continues. The 2nd District Court of Appeal backs up Greer, Demers and Baird. Where does it end? Even a videotape of MS strangling her would be barred as evidence at this point! Greer would say it's too late to revisit the prior findings, sorry, good bye.

How can justice be served when a woman's life rests on this suspiciously remembered hearsay, when the court acts as an accomplice to attempted murder? MS refused to allow Terri antibiotics, which is against the law, even before he even asked to have the feeding tube removed! How can that NOT be interpreted as attempted murder?

The only hope to see justice is to move this out of civil court and into criminal court. Let the HINO defend his actions under oath before a jury. Let the full weight of the law come down on his head and put his freedom at risk. Isn't that the very least the State of Florida owes Terri, whose LIFE is at risk?

40 posted on 01/12/2004 1:12:16 PM PST by msmagoo (Indict Michael Schiavo! Let a jury decide who is telling the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson