Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The acts of secession were legislation passed by the Texas legislature, and which violated the Constitution.

Where do you find this stuff? From some 'moderated' forum? The state of Texas elected delegates to the convention 8 Jan 1861, with the convention meeting in Austin on 28 Jan 1861.

John R. Baylor was a delegate - he was not a member of the legislature. Neither was delegate Albert C. Horton. And judge John Gregg, judge John Ireland, M. T. Johnson, William B. Ochiltree, Williamson S. Oldham, L. A. Abercrombie, Joseph H. Dunham, J. L. McCall etc. It was not the legislature that met.

After opening with prayer, the convention elected Texas Supreme Court Justice Oran M. Roberts as president, who declared, '[a]ll political power is inherent in the people. That power, I assert, you now represent.' On 1 Feb 1861 the convention voted 166-8 to secede. The convention also allowed the people to vote on secession, which passed 44,317 to 13,020 on 23 Feb 1861.

John McQueen, special commissioner to the convention from South Carolina, addressed it 2 Feb 1861:

Mr. President and Gentlemen of the Convention, I have been honored with a commission by the Convention of the State of South Carolina to repair to your State and lay before your Convention an ordinance of the State of South Carolina ...

You can read about the convention in Journal of the Secession Convention of Texas edited by E. W. Winkler, and published in 1912.

Approval of actions concerning the status of states was a power delegated to the United States Congress by Article IV of the Constitution.

No. Only the admission of NEW states was regulated.

When those public Acts do not violate the Constitution, yes.

No. Please re-read the Supremacy clause.

1,056 posted on 02/05/2004 9:41:14 AM PST by 4CJ (||) Support free speech and stop CFR - visit www.ArmorforCongress.com (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1055 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
"Mr. President and Gentlemen of the Convention, I have been honored with a commission by the Convention of the State of South Carolina to repair to your State and lay before your Convention an ORDINANCE of the State of South Carolina ..."

Ordinance is a synonym of LAW.

The supremacy clause:
Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

It doesn't say how the laws are enacted.

The powers were granted by the constitution. A state law(ordinance) can not trump the constitution.

1,058 posted on 02/05/2004 10:52:42 AM PST by hirn_man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Where do you find this stuff? From some 'moderated' forum?

No, history. The Texas Legislature voted to approve the actions of the secession convention.

No. Only the admission of NEW states was regulated.

No. Changes to existing states are regulated as well.

No. Please re-read the Supremacy clause.

I did, specifically clause 2.

1,067 posted on 02/06/2004 3:33:31 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson