Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa; CIBGUY
"-- ah, those areas came under the president's war powers."

Uh, I'm sorry...where exactly were the "president's war powers" enumerated in the US Constitution?

Does that give him carte blanche to discard individual's and state's rights as well?
342 posted on 01/17/2004 11:25:55 PM PST by Veracious Poet (Cash cows are sacred in America...how else are career politicians gonna get their golden parachutes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: Veracious Poet
"-- ah, those areas came under the president's war powers."

Uh, I'm sorry...where exactly were the "president's war powers" enumerated in the US Constitution?

Article II, Section 2

"Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;..."

President Lincoln wrote:

"You dislike the emancipation proclamation; and perhaps, would have it retracted. You say it is unconstitutional--I think differently. I think the Constitution invests the commander in chief with the law of war, in time of war. The most that can be said, if so much, is, that slaves are property. Is there--has there ever been--any question that by the law of war, property, both of enemies and friends, may be taken when needed? And is it not needed whenever taking it helps us, or hurts the enemy?"

Whatever you think of it, it is a commonly held interpretation.

Note also that the Militia Act of 1795 leaves when to call out the militia to the judgement of the president.

Walt

345 posted on 01/18/2004 1:41:21 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson