To: Non-Sequitur
Answer the question please: Did the court exceed their authority in saying a man is 3/5 of a person, or that a baby is a non-person? Yes or no.
510 posted on
01/20/2004 8:28:04 AM PST by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: exmarine
Did the Court exceed it's authority in Scott v Sandford or Roe v. Wade? No, because both those cases brought Constitutional issues before it. Do I agree with the decisions in either case? No, but that doesn't mean that they are valid decisions. My opinion on what is Constitutional and what is not has no legal standing. And neither, sad to say, does yours.
To: exmarine
No, but that doesn't mean that they are valid decisions. Typo. I meant to say that that doesn't mean that they aren't valid decisions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson