Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
There is nothing in the act that precludes unilateral action by the President.

The Supreme Court found that a blockade was lawful under the Laws of War and found in existence a War.

Now you are, once again, desperately citing the part of an Act regarding obstruction of the courts, and action permitted to assist the marshals of the courts.

Now, instead of fighting a war, you have The Lincoln combatting obstruction of the judicial system.

The Supreme Court found it was a WAR. They proclaimed the blockade lawful under THE LAWS OF WAR.

548 posted on 01/20/2004 11:21:01 AM PST by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
They proclaimed the blockade lawful under THE LAWS OF WAR.

They proclaimed the actions of the president lawful under the Militia Act.

Walt

646 posted on 01/20/2004 5:02:27 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson