Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carton253
Why didn't Lincoln just let South Carolina have Ft. Sumter? Why draw a line at Sumter when you allowed the Confederates to take over other US installations throughout the South?

First of all, Lincoln did not allow the confederates to seize federal facilities all over the south. Buchanan did that, and Lincoln was in record as opposing it. In several speeches prior to the inauguration, and in his inaugural address itself, Lincoln had stated his position that the U.S. would continue to retain those facilities belonging to it that had not already been seized by the Davis regime. And why not? Sumter was federal property, built by the federal government on land deeded to it by the South Carolina legislature, and the Davis regime had no claim to it.

96 posted on 01/15/2004 5:56:47 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
You are missing the forest for the trees. Lincoln knew that if he sent those ships into that harbor when the tensions between the Confederacy and Union ware at fevered pitch that the South would fire on his fleet. (And if he didn't understand this...then he was a fool.)

He knew and understood the consequences of his actions. It was a calculated political stroke on his part.

You seem to put great emphasis on Lincoln's words as if his words alone are all the proof any student of history would need to understand that Lincoln was just trying to keep the peace. Bull! He sent that fleet into that harbor to pick a fight with an opponent that was only too eager to oblige him.

97 posted on 01/15/2004 6:08:52 AM PST by carton253 (It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson