Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
Interesting implications.

If the feds have to compensate farmers for water diverted (stolen), will the fed also need to compensate property owners whose land was stolen to create de-facto federal nature preserves on private property?
6 posted on 01/13/2004 12:32:48 PM PST by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sergeantdave
If the feds have to compensate farmers for water diverted (stolen), will the fed also need to compensate property owners whose land was stolen to create de-facto federal nature preserves on private property?

They have to, if they want to follow the fifth amendment to the US Constitution which forbids them for taking private property for public use with out just compensation.

7 posted on 01/13/2004 1:02:06 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson