To: blau993
We already tried that with Silveria V Lockyer. The USSC refused to hear it. It brought up just such an issue (9th V 5th).
As I keep maintaining, the system is irrevocably broken.
48 posted on
01/15/2004 9:15:55 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
There was so much wrong with Silveria v. Lockyer that it would be a waste of time to speculate why the court didn't take it. I was personally glad they didn't. That case was flawed in many respects, and, without meaning to be disrespectful, the lawyer who was handling it was not somebody you would want arguing your case in the Supreme Court.
85 posted on
01/15/2004 12:03:18 PM PST by
blau993
(Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson