Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Morris' Mistake
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | January 19, 2004 | Allan Wall

Posted on 01/19/2004 2:49:47 AM PST by Main Street

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: Miss Marple
"So let us have some positive discussion of alternatives"

Vigorously enforce the current laws against hiring them instead of turning a blind eye because so many companies save money with illegal labor. That will stop alot of the demand. If there aren't that many jobs here then the flow will get reduced greatly.

This is not politically feasible in today's climate for some reason, so it's not discussed seriously.
41 posted on 01/19/2004 6:49:21 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; kittymyrib
First of all, how are you going to round them all up?

By beginning with the document-makers. By using Social Security records to look for "dead" people who are still working, or for workers who are getting four or five contributions per month into their SSA's.

By going to the places where the contractors hire and deploy their day labor, and looking for illegals.

House to house searches and demands to see the papers of every dark-haired person who answers the door?

No, workplace-to-workplace.

How many people would you need to do that?

Whatever, hire them.

And then, what are you going to do? Deport them without due process?

No, deport them with due process.

Put them in detention camps?

Only if the pipeline to Mexico backs up.

Aside from the legalities of doing this, I imagine the cost would be staggering.

Of course it would. So what? We get our country back. What's that worth to you? Or do you prefer being ruled by alien strangers, and lesbians, and race pimps?

Then what...ship them on busses to the border and drop them off?

Yes.

You surely don't think that Mexico will allow busses with deportees across their border, do you?

No need. The buses today stop at the American end of the bridge, and the passengers disembark and walk across the bridge to Mexico.

Rounding them up and shipping them out is not practical, and if you can't see how the media would portray this as some Nazi-like activity you are naive. The hammering we would take would be intense and international in scope.

Shipping them out is very practical, when the alternative is to give them the vote so they can vote for Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton and Charlie Schumer and "Busta" Bustamante.

Of course we'll get hammered in the press. And if we don't do this, we'll get hammered in the press. Do you really care what your enemies think? This is your home we're talking about. This is as high-stakes as it gets.

President Bush's proposal is the beginning of a carrot and stick approach. I think it could be improved, but at least it is an attempt to get things under control.

No, I'm sorry, I must strongly disagree. It is advancing a position that his biggest backers have indicated to him they want to see the Administration adopt, so they can keep on getting cheap labor, uninterrupted by noisome and embarrassing INS raids, like the Wal-Mart raids.

I am interested in the idea of giving them a year's grace period to leave, and then investigating employers, schools, and universities. That is more stringent than President Bush's proposal, but it is at least practical.

It will have no effect on people who are pouring across the border now in the face of your displeasure. They'll treat it as a lame measure and ignore it. Getting serious, right now, is what engages the attention of serious people like the fence-jumpers.

42 posted on 01/19/2004 6:50:06 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Et praeterea caeterum censeo, delenda est Carthago. -- M. Porcius Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Main Street
People here on FR condemned the Clinton supporters for agreeing with everything he did. Now these same people are doing the very same thing. Dissent is not allowed.

It is a very dangerous atmosphere when the people agree with everything a politician does, especially when the only reason is that he is of their party.

43 posted on 01/19/2004 6:54:50 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Immigration from south of the border is an enormous, complex problem

What, in your mind, makes this problem complex?

To me, it is simple, almost trivially so.

Round 'em up and send 'em home-or don't.

It's a simple choice, both alternatives are simple.

Wherein lies the complexity?

44 posted on 01/19/2004 6:56:25 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
It is necessary to face the fact that deporting all illegals is physically and economically impossible

Miss M., your posts are normally very astute, but I must ask:

Why do you think this is so?

It does not seem physically difficult, much less impossible, to round up all illegal aliens. It wouldn't take two months.

As far as it being economically impossible, this might be true (I am not that well informed on the Gross Illegal Alien Product), but it certainly seems like we could deal with it.

Please explain your comments.

45 posted on 01/19/2004 7:00:30 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I believe she was or is a citizen of Venezuela.
46 posted on 01/19/2004 7:03:29 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
And then, what are you going to do? Deport them without due process? Put them in detention camps? Aside from the legalities of doing this, I imagine the cost would be staggering.

Please cite evidence that illegal aliens must receive any specific procedural due process before being removed.

Any such "due process" flows from laws, and laws can be changed.

And they absolutely should be confined in secure facilities prior to removal beyond our borders, and again, the legality of such is a matter for Congress.

47 posted on 01/19/2004 7:05:05 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
This may sound like a stupid question .. but do Canadians come over the border to work here in the US?

Wayne Gretsky, Peter Jennings, Michael J. Fox...

48 posted on 01/19/2004 7:05:52 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Main Street
This arguement against immigration was proven wrong over one hundred years ago.

History repeats again.

I sure hope FReepers wise up.

49 posted on 01/19/2004 7:06:33 AM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
It's too simple to comprehend.
50 posted on 01/19/2004 7:06:43 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I propose we entirely dismiss the proposal.

It is necessary to face the fact that deporting all illegals is physically and economically impossible

I seem to remember us "deporting" all the Germans in France back into Germany during WW2. But since stuff like that is physically and economically impossible then I must be misremembering.

51 posted on 01/19/2004 7:12:17 AM PST by 34512a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Tell the "illegal immigrant community" that in 90 days there will be an SS number database. Thus they are given fair notice to get out of the USA with whatever they have saved up because very soon they will be out of a job. Free bus tickets back home will be offered. Even free plane tickets.

Get an on-line SS# database up and running within 3 months. Employers would be required to check out their employee's SS numbers or suffer fines and penalties. This will weed out at least half the illegal aliens. Without jobs they will self-deport themselves.

Pass a law that no illegal immigrant can enter a welfare office nor collect any kind of welfare benefits. Not even in the name of their children who might be American citizens. Many illegals will self-deport when this law goes into effect.

52 posted on 01/19/2004 7:14:53 AM PST by dennisw (“We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American way.” - Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jonno
Let the media portray it however they want. This is something that needs doing. Too bad we don't have a leader to do it.

Political suicide for the greater good of the country is not wrong.
53 posted on 01/19/2004 7:15:30 AM PST by 34512a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Sorry, I just can't comprehend/conceive of any logic in that.

Yeah! Sure man! Real easy job!

Just stick a big bag over the Statue of Liberties head and go to it!

:-)

Seriously, many FReepers are just not understanding the politics of this issue and the negatives of any kind of mass deportation.

The Bush plan will give the U.S. political cover for deportation numbers that I expect to be quite high as a result of non-qualification and non-compliance to the new regs.(unwritten as of yet)

Why don't we help to write those regs rather than cry over something that must be addressed as soon as possible in a realistic fashion.

Mass deportations and Army border guards are not and never will be realistic in any sense of the word.

Political cover is currently needed to deport a half dozen.

So what do you think 8 million would need?

54 posted on 01/19/2004 7:16:47 AM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Columba Bush is a native of Mexico. They met in Mexico when Jeb lived in Mexico on an exchange program assoc. w/ his high school; he was teaching English. She is a naturalized US citizen. http://www.myflorida.com/myflorida/governorsoffice/firstlady/biography.html
55 posted on 01/19/2004 7:22:00 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
http://www.myflorida.com/myflorida/governorsoffice/firstlady/biography.html
56 posted on 01/19/2004 7:23:14 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Self deportation is the name of the game. Enforce employee sanctions with the help of an on line SS number database. And you will have won half the game. Ban illegals from receiving welfare checks and benefits, even if it's for their children who may be US citizens.
57 posted on 01/19/2004 7:24:18 AM PST by dennisw (“We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American way.” - Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Seriously, many FReepers are just not understanding the politics of this issue and the negatives of any kind of mass deportation.

I plead guilty, I don't understand.

In polls, big, big majorities favor removing illegals and defending the borders.

If they rounded up eight million illegals and dropped them off in Mexico, I would cheer, and I imagine most Americans would as well.

Where's the beef? What don't I see?

58 posted on 01/19/2004 7:25:01 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Thanks, I thought maybe she was Cuban.
59 posted on 01/19/2004 7:28:11 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Are you saying that enforcing the laws of the United States is secondary to getting Bush reelected? If one isn't held accountable for his responsibilities, why bother? Just eliminate the American borders and sit back and see what happens. The way to deal with this is to punish those who knowingly hire illegals! Bif fines, time in the slammer, and those jobs will dry up. You're not paying any less by having a Mexican pick your toatoes, you're just creating more profit for the growers. Right now any farmer can buy equipment that will pick any crop, including tomatoes. Why don't they...because of Union opposition to the introduction of labor saving devices.
60 posted on 01/19/2004 7:32:04 AM PST by CIBGUY (CIBGUY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson