Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: will1776
Do you really not see how this is an establishment clause issue?

Query as to whether saying the words "God Bless" is enough to trigger an establishment clause challenge, but if you argue that it falls under the free exercise clause, you're making the concession that it is religious, which brings it back under the establishment clause. Once you're there, see Santa Fe Ind. School Dist. v. Doe. You can't provide a PA system to someone to make a religious message.

The better argument is that "god bless" is not a religious message, and is not protected under the Free Exercise clause at all.
23 posted on 01/21/2004 8:57:40 AM PST by Viva Le Dissention
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Viva Le Dissention
The better argument is that "god bless" is not a religious message, and is not protected under the Free Exercise clause at all.

What part of "nor prohibit the free exercise thereof" do you not understand?

Establishment Clause? Does the student equal Congress, or saying "God bless" equal making a law?

The intend of the 1st amendment is clear - the founders made it clear. The "wall of separation of church and state" was invented in 1947 (Everson case) and did not exist before that time. If you say it did, then you need to explain why there was no restriction on religious speech or activity in school or anywhere else prior to 1947. That's 160 years of precedents pal.

31 posted on 01/21/2004 9:39:33 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Viva Le Dissention
The Founding Fathers would be utterly amazed to hear the establishment clause invoked to prohibit the voluntary expression of a religious belief in a public school.
32 posted on 01/21/2004 9:40:59 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Viva Le Dissention
"You can't provide a PA system to someone to make a religious message."

Does that mean that military chaplains will now have to use megaphones paid for out of their own pocket?

Then there is always the question about even paying chaplains out of tax dollars. I suppose they could pass the collection plate and get by.

But wait! Shouldn't it also be illegal to preach on a battleship paid for with tax dollars? Time to keel-haul the chaplain. ;'<

Personally, I think it's hypocritical and dysfunctional of the 'powers-that-be' to allow the pledge of allegiance to the flag of our country in tax-funded schools while disallowing the mention of God under whose inspiration our country and our Constitution was founded.

Did we throw out the baby and keep the bathwater?

34 posted on 01/21/2004 9:43:52 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson