Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Kay states directly and clearly he does not think Iraq has biological and chemical weapon stockpiles.

The left and dems will use this big time to beat the dead BushLied horse.

I heard an audio excerpt of Kay saing this on ABC radio news last night and am surprised nothing was posted on this, unless I missed it.

1 posted on 01/24/2004 8:37:35 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tallhappy
No, with respect, Kay states that they don't have any large stockpiles. Who much anthrax does there have to be to be considered a large stockpile? How about Ricin? Botulinum toxin? Do you need large stockpiles to kill thousands of people?

I'd just like to know what the meaning of large is, and do small stockpiles mean the weapons are any less deadly?

2 posted on 01/24/2004 8:41:33 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
you missed it
4 posted on 01/24/2004 8:44:10 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
What the dem candidates said of Saddam and Iraq (he has wmd)
5 posted on 01/24/2004 8:45:56 AM PST by chance33_98 (I POST NEWS FROM ALABAMA, FLORIDA, OHIO....YEEEEEEEAAAWWWWWW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
Bush and most administration officials were very careful about their wording. The NGO's like OSP, AEI, and the INC did most of the distortion of "evidence". Cheney seems the one who's own words could come back on him, but I think he's gone either before or shortly after the election anyway.

I guess the lesson here is to forget anything that doesn't come directly from a named government source if you want accuracy and accountability.

6 posted on 01/24/2004 8:47:48 AM PST by steve50 ("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
Sheesh. Musta been a later night than I thought! I misread the headline as "Danny Kaye" and thought Hillary was channeling again. "Never mind".
8 posted on 01/24/2004 8:49:30 AM PST by Centaur (Never practice moderation to excess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
I guess Saddam shold've played his poker hand better.

Bush called him on it, he bluffed, and ended up losing, big time.

Bush should explain that all the evidence pointed to stockpiles, they were led to believe he had them, Saddam WANTED us to think he had them, he has used them, and if there was nothing to hide, why the secrecy after the Gulf War?

It's the intelligence, stupid.
11 posted on 01/24/2004 8:56:49 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
Also, the tape Powell played at the UN last year, the one where the 2 guys were talking about stuff being moved, making sure it was moved just before the UN inspectors got there, what was that all about.

They were ready to rock-n-roll as soon as the sanctions were lifted.

Bush does need to stay in front on this though, not back-pedaling.
14 posted on 01/24/2004 8:59:51 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons

The above is what he actually said.

I would like to questions asked.

1. Do you think they had small stockpiles?

2. Do you think they had a "just in time" capacity for quickly generating stocks?

15 posted on 01/24/2004 9:02:21 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
You know, I heard someone yesterday somewhere give this analogy (paraphrased)....Say there's a guy in your neighborhood who says he has a gun, and he wants to kill your family....YOU do NOT really KNOW if he has a gun, and he hasn't attempted to kill your family lately, but, he sure talks a lot about it, and he has family members saying the same thing....WHAT would YOU DO?
16 posted on 01/24/2004 9:04:54 AM PST by goodnesswins (Poverty is more about the "mental" than the "money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
Funny how THE question wasn't asked, eh?
17 posted on 01/24/2004 9:06:42 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
I don't think they existed.
20 posted on 01/24/2004 9:12:23 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
The left and dems will use this big time to beat the dead BushLied horse.

You're right. I just had a dicussion with a co-worker about this.

Of course, he didn't lie. Here's quotes on what he said. Look at Dubya's comments. He never says Iraq has WMD. He uses phrases like "we have sources that tell us" and "our intelligence officials estimate."

I have no doubt he believed what he was saying.

Note that the site's an anti-Bush site.

30 posted on 01/24/2004 9:27:57 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Allan
ping
31 posted on 01/24/2004 9:28:42 AM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
I was always leery of using WMD as the sole premise for going to war.
I knew that we had bombed the heck out of them for 10 years, and that most chem and bio weapons have a 'shelf-life' of only a few years, there wasn't going to be "tons and tons" of these weapons as Cheney kept saying.
They should have at least 2 points, one being humanitarian, many on the left would have gone along, and could not then accuse Bush of lying.
32 posted on 01/24/2004 9:32:29 AM PST by CMClay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
How many FReepers here want Saddam to resume power in Iraq? I get the feeling that Reuters and many other "news" outlets miss their old friend Hussein. Cheerleaders for the dark side.

Best regards,
Liberty

W'04
43 posted on 01/24/2004 10:23:16 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
No, I don't think they existed.

Even though in the mid-1980s people said they used it on Halabja?

Proving once again that leftist reporters won't let the facts get in the way of a anti-GOP hit piece.

48 posted on 01/24/2004 11:15:07 AM PST by Rome2000 (Ban "Jihad", not smoking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
The left and dems will use this big time to beat the dead Bush Lied horse.

Honestly, I don't think it matters what they try to use. WMD programs were found and Saddam clearly had the intent, so the danger existed.

I hope Kay is correct about stockpiles not existing because the idea of those weapons falling into the wrong hands is chilling.

51 posted on 01/24/2004 11:51:13 AM PST by alnick (A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
Yes, and WHY is this source Reuters from Africa? WERE IS THE OTHER US PRESS REPORTING?
52 posted on 01/24/2004 11:52:53 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign visit W-04.com for FREE STICKERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
I heard an audio excerpt of Kay saing this on ABC radio news last night and am surprised nothing was posted on this, unless I missed it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1063926/posts

61 posted on 01/24/2004 1:14:46 PM PST by alrea (let's go back to when liberalism meant freedom from central authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy
I heard an audio excerpt of Kay saing this on ABC radio news last night and am surprised nothing was posted on this, unless I missed it.

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1063926/posts

sorry. not too good at this.

62 posted on 01/24/2004 1:15:52 PM PST by alrea (let's go back to when liberalism meant freedom from central authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson