[Mike4Freedom]

I'd just like to know what the meaning of large is, and do small stockpiles mean the weapons are any less deadly?

I think that is pretty obvious. Large is enough to do some damage. Small is laboratory quantities for experimentation but not for practical use.

Note that there has not even been small quantities found. Don't you think that it is the WMD story that is the dead horse and the Bush Lied horse is alive and well and being furiously hidden behind the Wizard of Oz's curtain?

[mewzilla]

I got news for you :) Small can do a mother of a lotta damage, too. And you don't need a large, sophisticated facility to cook up some of this stuff. And if Saddamn wasn't doing anything in the WMD R&D area, what was with all the equipment and materials he was buying? Yeah, a lot of it was dual use (though you'd have to assume that ALL went to the innocent use if nothing was going on), but some of it was NOT dual use. And could only have been used for one thing: WMDs.

[Lance Romance]

I don't think small is laboratory quantities. I think he is saying that the old stockpiles, all of which have not been accounted for, may have been broken up and hidden.

Did anyone see the Kay report the other night on Frontline? They were pulling up to chemical plants, they would be stalled as weapons were driven out the back. They have pic of huge centrifuges for purifying uranium. I wonder if they ever found those.

anyone remember Mansoor Ijaz saying that there was evidence of a family with radiation poisoning they received from trying to smuggle uranium out of Iraq? I would love an update.