Skip to comments.
Kay on Today: "It Was Absolutely Prudent to Go to War Against Saddam" (Remarkable New Info)
The Today Show
Posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-239 next last
To: cyncooper
Thanks, CC. Sparking good interactions among my fellow FReepers provides me lots of positive reinforcement.
To: prairiebreeze
I know...but Im one of those person's Rush referred to yesterday as not being patient and the silence now will do a lot of harm.
82
posted on
01/27/2004 6:16:40 AM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Almighty God, Embrace with Your invincible armour our loved ones in all branches of the service.)
To: SquirrelKing
"Fair and Balanced"Maybe I should read some other posts before I send.
To: governsleastgovernsbest; Maria S
You're a nut case and a conspiratorial freak.Just kidding.
The liberal media have been spun a couple of times recently by Karl Rove. The Admin has manipulated them to report the worst news first, and then have the news improve. (O'Neill's "revelations") Whoever faxes out the DNC talking points might have decided it is best to get the liberal side's worst news out at this point, which is that Dems have been capitalizing on Kay's reports with some variation of "Bush Lied, People Died."
Therefore, according to predicted spin choreography patterns, the next items to come out will get a little better for Dems. The net effect is to protect the Dems from appearing too overtly partisan on matters of national security.
To: cyncooper; governsleastgovernsbest
BTW, I love your Today Show monitoring. You really provide a great service I agree .. Thank you so much governsleastgovernsbest
85
posted on
01/27/2004 6:19:03 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: NutCrackerBoy
...according to predicted spin choreography patterns...Is there actually a play book for this? The media does seem to have patterns in reporting, but has anyone done a study or ...?
86
posted on
01/27/2004 6:21:49 AM PST
by
InShanghai
(I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks for the ping; ka-bump.
87
posted on
01/27/2004 6:24:24 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
To: Wait4Truth
I don't suppose we will be hearing any of this on the cable networks. Let me state the obvious. Brit Hume and Carl Cameron were already broadcasting the equivalent of 'this' last night on Fox.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I don't know how you can stand it day after day, but you do a damn fine job.
89
posted on
01/27/2004 6:26:27 AM PST
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: jwalsh07
Lauer: "So scientists lied to Saddam, they told him they could develop WMDs, took huge sums of money and didn't deliver?" Kay: "Right. There was widespread corruption, lots of money wasted. People were concerned about the money, not about working."
Don't feel for me. Facts still stand. No massiv production of WMDs found
90
posted on
01/27/2004 6:26:47 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: prairiebreeze
Then Bush should point the finger at Billy Jeff.
91
posted on
01/27/2004 6:27:22 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: reed_inthe_wind
FYI
92
posted on
01/27/2004 6:28:20 AM PST
by
MEG33
(America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
To: metesky
I don't know how you can stand it day after day.Thanks, M. The secret is the positive feedback I get from my fellow FReepers. Well, that and a handy supply of Nexium!
To: onyx
Over here
94
posted on
01/27/2004 6:31:30 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This time I tuned in in time,so I can watch.
95
posted on
01/27/2004 6:31:39 AM PST
by
MEG33
(America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
To: MEG33
Please let me know what you think.
To: Mo1
Righto. Thanks. :)
97
posted on
01/27/2004 6:32:50 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; bert; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; Alamo-Girl; windchime; ...
From a national security and political perspective, what was much more important than the tone of Lauer's questions was the substance of Kay's remarks. Democrats looking to exploit Kay's earlier remarks to accuse the Bush administration of misleading the American people will come away from this interview bitterly disappointed, their arguments in tatters.
For on every issue down the line, Kay forcefully made the case that the Bush administration acted in good faith, that Saddam was indeed a threat, and that war against him was absolutely justified.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What we know, and DNC-AP worked to re-bury, along with the mass graves.
98
posted on
01/27/2004 6:33:21 AM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("The chapter of Iraq's history - Saddam Hussein's reign of terror - is now closed." Lt. Gen. Sanchez)
To: GraniteStateConservative
FYI
99
posted on
01/27/2004 6:34:27 AM PST
by
MEG33
(America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Thanks Very Much For The Ping, Ragtime Cowgirl!!!!:-)
100
posted on
01/27/2004 6:34:39 AM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-239 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson