Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kay on Today: "It Was Absolutely Prudent to Go to War Against Saddam" (Remarkable New Info)
The Today Show

Posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-239 next last
To: GraniteStateConservative
What independents want to know is who is held responsible for this failure?

Clinton of course. Intelligence forces were decimated during his tenure.

No answer though as to why German, Israeli, Brit, French and UN intel also was flawed. I sorta think it wasn't so flawed......

Prairie

61 posted on 01/27/2004 6:02:40 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Maybe Kay will do some campaigning for the President...or maybe some ads will be made from his remarks. I don't know. All I know is that the RATS are lying and will continue to do so. They rely on the public being basically uninformed. Most people are not political junkies like us.
62 posted on 01/27/2004 6:03:45 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Ahh, a coux by radials Islamists taking out Saddam.

I maintain our intel, while needing improvements after years of downsizing and underfunding, might not be so awful after all.

Prairie
63 posted on 01/27/2004 6:04:36 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
My pleasure, thanks for your comment.
64 posted on 01/27/2004 6:06:05 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
No, not devoted to them...just the interviews in general. While the NPR thread was devoted to wailing and gnashing about his WMD remarks, I plucked out his most interesting quote about "what their inspections found indicated Iraq was potentially (he does sometimes qualify it with "potential") more dangerous than we had thought".

When I highlighted it, some wondered what it could mean. The only thing I could think of was terrorist ties and evidence of plots being assembled. One anti-Bush person assured me it was spin.

Glad to see Kay keep repeating this. Finally heard him in the Brokaw interview point to robust missile production and terrorism. I see on Today he says "terrorists attracted to Iraq like flies to honey" (my quotes all paraphrased from memory). The truth of that will come out---is coming out---and prove that the dem line that "going into Iraq strenghtened terrorists" as wrong.

65 posted on 01/27/2004 6:07:20 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
That's true...all they will hear is *over 500 soldiers died for Bush's mistake*...
66 posted on 01/27/2004 6:08:07 AM PST by mystery-ak (Almighty God, Embrace with Your invincible armour our loved ones in all branches of the service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
I maintain our intel, while needing improvements after years of downsizing and underfunding, might not be so awful after all.

I agree .. and I think that is the point that Kay was trying to make in this interview

He didn't completely knock them .. just said that we need better intelligence over in that area of the world ..

67 posted on 01/27/2004 6:08:10 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
radials = radicals

Thinking snow tires here this morning, sigh

Prairie
68 posted on 01/27/2004 6:08:30 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Oh, and I looked last night for a Brokaw thread and couldn't find one. If I find a transcript and nobody else has posted it yet, I'll do so.

I'll guess Lauer modeled his interview on Brokaw's example.
69 posted on 01/27/2004 6:08:47 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
From your fingertips to God's ears cyn!

One anti-Bush person assured me it was spin.

LOL!

Thanks, Praire

70 posted on 01/27/2004 6:10:27 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Perhaps they have been given a "Heads up" to tone down their Bias ,since the networks are not in the best of shape and need to come to a more "Fair and Balanced " Position.
71 posted on 01/27/2004 6:10:29 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Nicely done.
72 posted on 01/27/2004 6:11:23 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
BTW, I love your Today Show monitoring. You really provide a great service.

73 posted on 01/27/2004 6:11:53 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Kay: "It was absolutely prudent to go to war. The system was collapsing, Iraq was a country with desire to develop WMDs, and it was attracting terrorists like flies to honey."

There could be a jewel that was sent to Syria to be smuggled to DC. If it exists, it will be DC.

Thanks to the Today Show for realizing how dangerous this is. Thanks to Kay and the Today Show for not putting the priority on getting fellow Liberals back in the White House. It literally might not be there if the worst is true.

74 posted on 01/27/2004 6:11:55 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Don't worry, when the President starts campaigning his message will be heard.

Prairie
75 posted on 01/27/2004 6:12:07 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
.
76 posted on 01/27/2004 6:12:23 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions.

Okay, maybe I was isogeting Lauer's approach a bit. Was Matt having "Fair and Balanced" moment?

77 posted on 01/27/2004 6:12:25 AM PST by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I'll guess Lauer modeled his interview on Brokaw's example.

I'd say you're exactly right, and indeed at one point Lauer even quoted from Kay's interview with Brokaw.

78 posted on 01/27/2004 6:12:50 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
He said Bush just told him to search for the truth

Would DEAN Edwards Karey Clinton(either) Gore put it this way if they had a shot at a poll improvement?

79 posted on 01/27/2004 6:14:35 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
Was Matt having "Fair and Balanced" moment?

I think he was. It will be interesting to see if this reoccurs, or if the NBC honchos will take him aside and warn him "look, we Dems have an election to win. Get on the team, or get off the bus!"

80 posted on 01/27/2004 6:14:57 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson