Skip to comments.
Kay on Today: "It Was Absolutely Prudent to Go to War Against Saddam" (Remarkable New Info)
The Today Show
Posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions. I don't know if I'd say supportive ... but he was surprised and I do give Matt credit in asking further questions to clear things up on the way the media and the liberals are running wild and spinning Kays words
41
posted on
01/27/2004 5:49:00 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Only kooks think Bush mislead the US and they're voting Dem anyway. What independents want to know is who is held responsible for this failure?
42
posted on
01/27/2004 5:51:19 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: cripplecreek
I've already seen comments in other forums that the White House had "gotten" to kay. Well, he did tearfully say at the end of the interview "if my daughter can see this, I want her to know that I love her, and that she should stay strong, and that every hour brings us closer to her."
Just kidding! ;-)
To: McGruff
Kay thinks there is a possibility (possibly a strong one) that parts of the WMD program were shipped elsewhere (equipment, starter chemicals, notes, etc.). There's no evidence that stockpiles were shipped elsewhere.
44
posted on
01/27/2004 5:53:07 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: undeniable logic
What intrigues me is the part that the sons would have played or did play in the WMD programs or possible sale of them to terrorists.
After the sanctions would have been lifted, no telling what these wackos could have done, with Bin Ladens millions.
To: Wphile
ping to Kay's remarks on Today show
46
posted on
01/27/2004 5:55:10 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: cyncooper
As others have mentioned, it will be fascinating to see how the liberal media report on Kay's remarkable statements. I expect them, and the Dem candidates, to largely ignore them.
To: undeniable logic; governsleastgovernsbest
...Saddam had the intention of developing WMDs, paid huge somes [sic]
of money following his intention, and actually believed that he had them.Ah, that would be the great military strategist that Saddam is (or was?)
BTTT for Excellent work: Providing classic material like this to those of us without the ability (and possibly the desire) to watch the show. This should be headline news around the world, but unfortunately it will probably only be here on FR :(
48
posted on
01/27/2004 5:55:51 AM PST
by
InShanghai
(I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good read. Thanks for writing and posting that.
To: toolbreaker
Kay's similar quotes have been all over different media for three days now.
I and one or two other freepers have been pointing them out and not even fellow freepers seemed much interested until this 3rd or 4th Kay interview...
It's been reported for days now, is my point.
To: Quilla
Amazing picture Quilla!
51
posted on
01/27/2004 5:56:27 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: roses of sharon
After the sanctions would have been lifted, no telling what these wackos could have done, with Bin Ladens millions. The way Kay talked .. it sounded to me like Kay was describing a picture of how the talibin took over in Afghanistan and that how something like that could have happened in Iraq if we had not gone in there when we did
52
posted on
01/27/2004 5:58:05 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Lauer's supportive tone was almost as equally surprising..."
I'm not surprised. Call me a nut case, conspiratorial freak, whatever...I will continue to believe that ALL (ABCNBCCBSCNN) understand that Hillary Clinton intends to WIN in 2008, and to do that, President Bush HAS to win in 2004. So the appearance of a little "supportiveness" of the President is in order for right now.
53
posted on
01/27/2004 5:58:15 AM PST
by
Maria S
("I will do whatever the Americans want…I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid." Gaddafi, 9/03)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
As others have mentioned, it will be fascinating to see how the liberal media report on Kay's remarkable statements. I expect them, and the Dem candidates, to largely ignore them. Yes. As I said, these are not new remarks, but were delivered in a more open and accessible (how many housewives read the Telegraph?) environment.
He's been saying it, and if it was hard to get even freepers interested for these last days, I'm not surprised the libs ignored it.
Glad to see it finally sinking in.
To: InShanghai
You're very welcome. For a change, the focus of my Today Show post was not the liberal bias of the host, but the important information offered by the guest.
To: Quilla
I agree. If you can hide one of these, image how easy it would be to hide a liter of anthrax.... EXACTLY!!
56
posted on
01/27/2004 5:59:25 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: All
If you would like to be added to or removed from my ping list of semi-regular reports on liberal bias at The Today Show, please post a reply or drop me a private message.
To: cyncooper
Have there been any threads posted that you're aware of about the NPR or Brokaw segments?
Prairie
58
posted on
01/27/2004 6:00:22 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: billbears; Burkeman1; Torie
biibears,burkeman1,
Bad news for you guys but I am feeling your pain.
torie,
Perhaps Kay is an evil neocon.
59
posted on
01/27/2004 6:00:33 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Maria S
Call me a nut case, a conspiratorial freak.OK, you're a nut case and a conspiratorial freak.
Just kidding - I wouldn't want to say that about any of my fellow FReepers. But I think it might be giving Lauer and the rest of the vast left-wing conspiracy a little too much credit for long-range planning.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-239 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson