Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kay on Today: "It Was Absolutely Prudent to Go to War Against Saddam" (Remarkable New Info)
The Today Show

Posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: Wait4Truth
I don't suppose we will be hearing any of this on the cable networks.

That's exactly what was going through my mind as I watched the interview unfold. This was blockbuster stuff. Will the networks cover it? Will the NY Times give it 1/10th the inches it devoted to Kay's original "there are no WMDs" report? Somehow I doubt it.

21 posted on 01/27/2004 5:36:47 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I agree, Crime Dog. Why not ask directly about Syria? Further indications of this simply being a case of Lauer not doing his homework perhaps?
22 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:00 AM PST by The G Man (Wesley Clark is just Howard Dean in combat boots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks for your report. It must be ratings. Katy & Matt are whores along with being flaming liberal partisans. I don't trust either of them.
23 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:27 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"It was absolutely prudent to go to war. The system was collapsing, Iraq was a country with desire to develop WMDs, and it was attracting terrorists like flies to honey."

I don't suppose we'll see this quote in the New York Times.

24 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:27 AM PST by toolbreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Katie and Matt keep this up, I could be out of my "job" at FR, reporting on blatant liberal bias at The Today Show!

No. Think of it this way: what candidates supported the war or voted in favor of action? Who would the Libs want to be able to "forgive" a vote if they can show he was misled (even to the point of saying Bush was also misled) to make that canadidate more palatable as the Dem Nominee?

Kerry

25 posted on 01/27/2004 5:37:28 AM PST by theDentist (Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Come on....Iraq is the size of Californina. IMHO, it's still too soon to make a conclusive decision.

I agree. If you can hide one of these, image how easy it would be to hide a liter of anthrax....


26 posted on 01/27/2004 5:38:28 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Interesting theory. Devious, but interesting!
27 posted on 01/27/2004 5:39:46 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Wow. What a great interview! When I saw that Kay was on I thought that it would be another I-got-the-goods-on-Bush tell all, but I was happily mistaken. Laur did a good job but it was evident that Kay was taking all the wind out of his sails. This should be broadcast against Dean, Edwards, Clark, and John Franken Kerry whenever they wet their pants over Iraq.
28 posted on 01/27/2004 5:39:48 AM PST by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
It's good that he has said these things. However since the left can't digest information in it's true form they will continue to spin that Bush intentionally led us into this war based on lies. Get ready for the big battle.
29 posted on 01/27/2004 5:41:17 AM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
I agree that Kay was amazingly supportive of the Bush administration, but I must respectfully disagree that Lauer was out to get W and that Kay was "taking the wind out of his sails." I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions.
30 posted on 01/27/2004 5:41:47 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I agree, especially after watching several rat pundits last night...the mantra for this election is already in place....*Bush lied, and caused over 500 US deaths*...*The Bush Doctrine can never work with faulty intel*....and my fav..*It was ultimately Bush's decision, the buck stops here*....
31 posted on 01/27/2004 5:42:42 AM PST by mystery-ak (Almighty God, Embrace with Your invincible armour our loved ones in all branches of the service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks!
32 posted on 01/27/2004 5:43:55 AM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
never underestimate the power of the halfwit liberal mind. ive allready seen comments in other forums that the white house had "gotten" to kay.
33 posted on 01/27/2004 5:44:59 AM PST by cripplecreek (.50 cal border fence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Excellent report. Thanks much.
34 posted on 01/27/2004 5:45:31 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime; prairiebreeze
FYI Ping
35 posted on 01/27/2004 5:45:36 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
What I find interesting is that Saddam had the intention of developing WMDs, paid huge somes of money following his intention, and actually believed that he had them. I do think we are expecting a lot from our intelligence agency if we have the expectation of knowing more about the state of Iraq's WMD programs than Saddam himself.
36 posted on 01/27/2004 5:45:51 AM PST by undeniable logic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushMeister
FYI
37 posted on 01/27/2004 5:47:35 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lauer and Katie have fallen to number 2 in the ratings.

You don't supose that they have discovered "Trash Bush... Tatings fall. Be fair ... Ratings rise" do you?

Nah!!! Katie and Lauer are both to perky to figure that out.

38 posted on 01/27/2004 5:47:50 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head
Interesting info ping :-)
39 posted on 01/27/2004 5:47:58 AM PST by Marie Antoinette (Happily repopulating the midwest since 1991!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
that Saddam was indeed a threat, and that war against him was absolutely justified.

I have been patiently pointing out for two days that in two different interviews that I know of, (NPR, then yesterday's Brokaw), Kay said what they found indicated Iraq was MORE of a threat than we thought before going in. I surmised due to terrorism when I heard it the first time, and indeed, that's what he pointed to, in part, in his Brokaw, and now Today interviews.

He's been saying it, it's been buried, and like you, I termed it a bombshell revelation.

40 posted on 01/27/2004 5:48:45 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson