[governsleastgovernsbest]

I agree that Kay was amazingly supportive of the Bush administration, but I must respectfully disagree that Lauer was out to get W and that Kay was "taking the wind out of his sails." I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions.

[Mo1]

I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions.

I don't know if I'd say supportive ... but he was surprised and I do give Matt credit in asking further questions to clear things up on the way the media and the liberals are running wild and spinning Kays words

[SquirrelKing]

I sensed a surprisingly supportive tone in the manner in which Matt framed his questions.

Okay, maybe I was isogeting Lauer's approach a bit. Was Matt having "Fair and Balanced" moment?

[RinaseaofDs]

The press is writing this year off. The Dems have to move to the center. After 9/11, of course security is going to be top of the list with everyone.

It's another one of those issues they don't want to be on the wrong side of.

The libs are getting whacked by one entrenched issue after another. Abortion, security, welfare, the war, immigration, etc.

They can't go forward being anti-war, and they are ALL anti-war except Lieberman, and he's got no money or support.

The press has the biggest saw, but it's not cutting like it used to, and they are getting hammered by Fox - and its also hammering their other shows.

You are seeing modern journalism coming back to the center, and it isn't good. We know what they actually are, and now they are applying the pancake makeup.