Who says George W. Bush has done "nothing" for conservatives?

WhiteHouse.gov; various news sources ^ | 1/27/04

[Joe Hadenuf]

Most of these folks wont hear it. Many of them live and breath their political party, and little else matters. Like I stated earlier, if Clinton would have spent money like this, and suggested that millions that have broken our laws be rewarded, these very same people would be the most outraged, and would be going after Clinton's head by any means possible.

I find it all very distasteful. IMO, not the type of people you'd want on your side anyway.

[Bikers4Bush]

1.) Depends on who the candidates are.

2.) The Constitution Party Presidential candidate is Michael A. Peroutka.

3.) Who knows, nobody can see into the future.

You think that dictates irrelevance fine. I don't.

[PhiKapMom]

If they wouldn't have approved the pork, the budget bill would never have cleared the Senate and we would have had another shutdown of Government which is exactly what the RATs want.

Don't understand why people cannot see what is happening. We don't have the numbers to defeat some of these add-ons the RATs are doing along with some Republicans.

[Mo1]

LOL, no but the "Nice try" was a classic "your comments have no merit" dismissal that was meant to alienate.

Maybe because your alientate and belittle arugment was a little week

[antiRepublicrat]

Uh..WhiteHouse.gov. That makes it totally unbiased.

Well, he could have gotten info from whitehouse.com or whitehouse.org.

[George W. Bush]

I thought so too until I had to go observe the Dean blog after the Iowa caucus -- guess what -- some of their posts were word for word what I see on here by posters. The same can be said of the others campaigns.

Well, I wish you'd posted a thread or flagged some of us to it. I'd like to see the evidence for 'word for word' postings myself.

Maybe the moderators didn't catch 'em quick enough. But I saw a number dispatched, one vaporized by JimRob himself with considerable verve and humor.

We're an open forum. I'm saying that if the disruptors come here, they get zapped quick. And the nonsense of them sneaking back in with multiple IDs is considerably reduced over what we once had.

Besides, do you really think Dim campaigns have time for us? It would be more likely that DU and others are toying with us. The actual Candidates Of Evil Democrat presidential campaigns seem to be a little preoccupied in New Hampshire.

I just don't see that their time would be well-spent here at FR during the last days of their primary. Can't see that anyone here is converting to vote for any Dim except our NH independent-registered rightwingers who plan to vote Lieberman or Dean. And I see no indication that any of those who have so announced their intent are disruptors or agents provocateurs. Just good FReepers with different strategies for intruding on the Dim primary. (IMO, they'll probably cancel each others' votes out.)

[woodyinscc]

Pathetic.

You cannot answer the question, can you?

[Bikers4Bush]

Considering I ride I don't have anything against bikers so the question makes no sense to me.

[FirstPrinciple]

The only person who argues for the sake of arguing is Dane. I argue only when I have a point.

[George W. Bush]

See my reply to Phi in #206.

[MJY1288]

I agree that we could do without those initiatives, but that's not going to get me to throw away my vote on some unelectable and watch John Kerry initiate his agenda next year, How bout you?

[PhiKapMom]

I find it all very distasteful. IMO, not the type of people you'd want on your side anyway.

You finally wrote something I agree with -- feel exactly the same way.

[onyx]

Blame? Ha! The marriage initiative is a stroke of genius. President Bush is promoting marriage which is an offense statergy in the face of gay marriages.

Went right over your head. Whooooooosh.

[MeekOneGOP]

Is "WHO WOULD THE TERRORIST VOTE FOR" a bumper sticker that can be purchased? If so, where?

That is a popular item. Uh, MJY1288 ... can you reply ??

[Condor51]

Your welcome. And yes the WH site has links to many areas of varying interest; Historical, etc. - not only for Bushbots.

BTW a link to all of Dubya's EO's
While I can't state as fact, I doubt WILLARD was this open about his administration's antics actions. And I personally like the EO dated February 17, 2001 revoking Billy Jeff's EO 12933 which was outright pandering to the trade unions and communistic in nature.

[FirstPrinciple]

How about an initiative to cut the size of the govt.

[George W. Bush]

The only person who argues for the sake of arguing is Dane.

Oh, I think Dane might have a little company here at FR. On most any issue.

You really should flag him if you disparage him. Fair is fair.

[spodefly]

Is government larger or smaller since Bush took office? Are there more laws and regulations affecting my life, and the choices I make, or less? Are there more government agencies or less? Are there more cabinet level departments or less? Is there more government surveilance of my activities or less? Is the Federal deficit larger of smaller? Is overall spending by the Federal government up or down? Is the Federal government more involved in the control of the banking and financial systems or less? Do I have more freedom, more liberty, or less? How many government programs have been abolished? Are question like these considered conservative any more? Has conservatism really only become a debate about the nature and administration of socialist programs?

BUMP.

[Ophiucus]

Great work on the "Who says George W. Bush has done "nothing" for conservatives?" list!

Thank you very much.

[PhiKapMom]

Weasley Clark asked his people to start coming on FR -- I put up that post -- it was a direct instruction from his campaign manager to his supporters.

Same is true on the other blogs! It is amazing to see the postings on there and see the very same thing on here word for word attacking the President. I don't even hit abuse anymore -- not worth the time and most can be shown to be less than honest.

Maybe you can tell me why so many of the anti-Bush people have changed screen names. We have at least one example on this thread. When Meek changed his, he made sure that everyone knew he used to be MeeknMing. Why don't the anti-Bush people want us to know who they used to be?