Police search for Oklahoma bombing video

Kansas City Star ^ | February 3, 2004 | AP

[templar]

Mills said the video included images showing the building before the bombing, then with a "small glow" at its base, then with a "ball of fire rising from the building," according to the affidavit.

Doesn't sound like a legitimate video. It should show a truck exploding in front of the building.

[Jeanie]

It didn't cost that much back then.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I think that it may show something other than the official government story and therefore must be supressed!

[LurkedLongEnough]

! ?

[newgeezer]

The term "militia" was demonized during that period, too.

[blam]

"Nichols already has been convicted of federal charges in the April 19, 1995, blast. "

I don't remember what year this occured but, I know it wasn't 1995.

[Walkingfeather]

er um... if the video exsists it shows the blast INSIDE the building as opposed to OUTSIDE from a truck. I remember the way early days on the internet ( may have been FR cant remember) but sismographs picked up 2 explosions 1.4 secs a part.

[_Jim]

The OKC police should talk to the Fed govt. They really do have videos.

michael redvero has 'em - he's even posted a gif-frame-animation of them here (on FR before) ...

[petro45acp]

"Tell me what the significance is? Just that it caught the explosion on tape? or that it shows something different than our current understanding?"

"It allegedly shows the explosion taking place inside the building."

The rumor mill had two sets of explosions. One from multiple charges in the building which weakened support pillars then the larger, slower ampho explosion from the truck.

[job]

The seismic event was an anomaly that has been debunked by the OGS. The original guy, I know him, picked up two separate seismic events. Originally, it was thought to represent two (2) explosions, which gave way to the internal explosion theory. Then, it was surmised that the 2nd signal was generated by the collapse of the building just moments late. I think the final interpretation, espoused by the Charles Mankin, is that it is an artifact created by the transmission of the same signal along two different mediums: a slower shale, and a faster sandstone.

[Blzbba]

"They went in the same black hole as the reinforced concrete columns in the basement that would have shown local bomb damage, or the front door of the building in Waco which might have shown who fired the first bullets in which direction.

Or the Xrays and photos that vanished out of a safe in the Vince Foster murder case. Or the Xrays that vanished out of the safe in the Ron Brown murder case."


Or the computer records that showed who made all those airline-stock transactions on 9-10-01, which were destroyed when WTC 7 collapsed...

[twinzmommy]

1995, yep it was. I was pregnant with my twins, who were born five days later.

[_Jim]

but sismographs picked up 2 explosions 1.4 secs a part.

Meanwhile witnesses report only one - why the diff?

[WilliamofCarmichael]

It took years for patriots to get action out of Congress to investigate Ruby Ridge and Waco. That is, to investigate for real.

They endured taunts, ridicule, threats. They were laughed at, their "tin foil" hats and all.

It really does not take much googling to find mainstream press with stories that prove that there were other men with McVeigh that morning. The most complete source seems to be the Denver Post. I say prove because I cannot imagine what would possess ordinary Americans to lie. These are witnesses who were in the area on business or because they worked nearby. They are not selling books or videos. They were ignored as witnesses for McVeigh's trial, they saw others with McVeigh.

A six-month investigation by Steve Wilmsen and Mark Eddy Denver Post Staff Writers was published in December, 1996. The multi-part series named at least two witnesses who actually tried to speak to McVeigh and the men who were with him that morning in the truck and the Mercury. To wit,

"Around 8:30 a.m. Tulsa banker Kyle Hunt saw a yellow Mercury driving behind a Ryder truck in downtown Oklahoma City. The two vehicles moved slowly, and Hunt said he initially thought the vehicles belonged to a family that was moving and had become lost in the maze of downtown's one-way streets. Hunt, who was in town for a business meeting and knew his way around the city, pulled up next to the car, ready to ask the driver if he needed help. But the man, whom he later identified as Tim McVeigh, shot him a nasty look, and Hunt decided to keep his mouth shut. There were two other people in the car with McVeigh, Hunt said. Hunt couldn't see into the cab of the Ryder. A short time later, David Snider saw McVeigh in the passenger seat of a Ryder truck with another man. Snider was waiting for a truck to pick up some equipment, so he was standing on a downtown loading dock looking for trucks. . . ."

http://63.147.65.175/bomb/bomb.htm

Select the 1996 archives. Select "Who bombed the Murrah Building?"

[sharktrager]

In Vegas there are lots of ATM's that dispense 100's.

[job]

see post 30

[weegee]

How about in OKC?

I can put a one dollar bill into a machine and get 100 Kennedy half dollars back but that doesn't have much to do with this conversation.

[sharktrager]

You said that ATM's only give 200's. If you meant only in OKC, you should have said so.

That said, I get 100's and 50's from the bank on an almost weekly basis.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Some witnesses heard and felt two explosions apparently.

". . .Dr. Raymon Brown, a seismologist with the Oklahoma Geological Survey, 'explained how two explosions' could be heard or felt by witnesses.

"[Dr. Brown] stated that the ground wave [from a single explosion -- outside, in front of the building] was probably heard first, with an air wave following, giving the impression of two explosions. . .Because the speed of sound is faster in the earth, the ground wave arrives early. The air wave follows, which allows the explosion to be heard. . . Other experts refuted that explanation."