Execute a third-party tantrum over every slight, real and imagined...and watch the GOP go court someone else's vote, because you're telling them that you cannot be relied on in any way, shape, or form. This is not for people who like short slogans and sound bites, but there is a fascinating and very insightful article from a Dean supporter here. It's kind of a post-mortem, and it concerns how the Deaniacs (including Dean himself) managed to con themselves into thinking they had actual popular support... when what they were really experiencing was their own noise bouncing around in an echo chamber on the Internet. I recommend this article to all thinking Freepers, because we here on FR are vulnerable to making the same mistakes. We had our very own on-line echo chamber long before anyone ever heard of Howard Dean. And if we're honest about it, we'll admit that we have had our own little 'Deaniac' episodes along the way. One of the things I try to keep in perspective is that, to the extent that I fit in here, I am a 95th percentile right-wing nut. Anyone who ran for office using my positions, on my hot-button issues, would go down in flames in all but a handful of Congressional districts. The minute I forget that, I have lost touch with reality. I have seen numerous posts on this thread so far alleging widespread dissatisfaction with the direction the Republican Party has been taking in recent years. Earth to Freepers: the market is signalling the Republicans that they are doing everything right. Some of us have wondered over the years whether we would ever live to see the day that Republicans would hold the White House, both houses of Congress, and a majority of the Governorships. Not only do they have that now, they increased their majorities in both houses in the last election. If I run the GOP, and you come to tell me that I'm doing it all wrong, I am going to dismiss you as a nut. Folks, let's not fall into the Deaniac Internet Echo-Chamber trap. We are not the American electorate. We are highly vocal ring-wing nuts... the exact counterpoint to Dean's highly vocal left-wing nuts. Our advice on how to win elections is worth about as much as Howard Dean's is right now. And that's especially true for guys who have gone from being in the wilderness for 40 years, to owning the Democrats. That's not to say that the GOP can't screw things up. Nothing is forever. But let's be cool about this and recognize that we are not the guys anyone is going to come to for advice on what to do next. Boo and hiss at Karl Rove all you want, but Bush is President and his party gained seats in both houses during an off-year election... not an easy or common thing to pull off. There is no objective fact for Bush to look at that doesn't tell him that Karl Rove is very good at what he does. One of the things that many people have speculated about is whether the Deaniacs will accept reality, or whether they will go off in a snit... and come November, either write in Howard, or vote for Ralph Nader, or stay home altogether. People wonder about that because the Deaniacs are widely perceived to be a bunch of immature moonbeamers. I hope we can do better than that. |
It is because of FR that His Slickness was impeached.
It is because of FR that Gore was unable to steal Election 2000.
It is because of FR in spite of the Star Chamber that I have hope for '04.
Sugarcoating Sh*t does noone any good.
I have been posting much the same thing, but gotten trashed and stalked for my trouble. I hope and pray that people will take accept your sane, well written post.
I recommend this article to all thinking Freepers, because we here on FR are vulnerable to making the same mistakes. We had our very own on-line echo chamber long before anyone ever heard of Howard Dean. And if we're honest about it, we'll admit that we have had our own little 'Deaniac' episodes along the way.
|
Your post is spot-on.
However, it's evident that the current direction of the country is increasingly socialist no matter what party is in power.
In short: America is screwed. We're going socialist, people. Might as well get used to it.
Good post Nick. However in regard to this point, I'd suggest past performance is hardly a predictor of future success. We had a very different set of circumstances in place in 2002. Obviously 9/11 was a more recent occurrence, but also the administration had not veered left with the likes of Prescription Drug Bills, amnesty, etc.
Pre-2002 I'd submit this administration was acting far more conservative than it has since. They'd have been well-advised to continue on that course, yet here we are.
That's the point of many of us here. This leftward drift is actually damaging Bush's reelection chances, and some of us are trying to surface the issue before it's too late.
As far as you're concerned, we have no role to play in these elections, other than to meekly pull the R lever. If we are so ineffective and not listened to, why do you bother with FRN? The GOP doesn't pay any attention to FR, according to you, we're just a bunch of "nuts." Thanks for making that clear.
I have a higher opinion of FReepers. I've seen us in action many times over the years and witnessed our successes. I've seen for myself and been told of our impact. To dismiss us as the irrelevant right-wing equivalant of Deaniacs is insulting.
If, as you say, we don't matter, then who cares if we vote third party? Or are we just trying to protect our invitations to Important Conservative Republican Meetings?
P.S. I have seen numerous posts on this thread so far alleging widespread dissatisfaction with the direction the Republican Party has been taking in recent years. Earth to Freepers: the market is signalling the Republicans that they are doing everything right.
The article which these comments are based on states that the Republican Caucus is responding to market forces telling them of widespread dissatisfaction with the direction the party is taking.
P.P.S. I read the Deaniac article. Liberals falling for a fantasy is nothing new. The Deaniacs were just the last ones to figure out Howard Dean was not presidential material.