Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky2
I'm not one to defend pervert criminals, but I think you're maybe jumping the gun on the judge in this case. The only information I've seen is that Smith was in court in December for a probation violation. There is a huge variety of things that can cause someone to go in for a probation violation. That could be anything from being five minutes late for a meeting with your p.o. to committing a new crime. The less serious violations are, duh, dealt with less seriously. If they weren't, we'd have to build MANY new prisons, since a high percentage of felons get called in at least once for a probation violation. Many violators do not receive additional incarceration for minor violations, although they may receive other consequences. This can be true whether the judge is liberal or conservative. So, before I'd feel comfortable condemning the judge, I'd want to know the nature of Smith's violation
54 posted on 02/06/2004 10:25:49 AM PST by a_strindberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: a_strindberg
It is good to assume innocence until proven guilty. To not "judge" until you've gathered evidence in favor and/or against guilt.

I've read enough that I'm not of the stance that he's guilty. His lifestyle, his "matching" the description shown on the video (tatoos, hair, uniform, location), and his uncooperation with the investigation lead me to believe at this point that he's the guilty party.

If he's guilty, he needs to be removed from our gene pool.
56 posted on 02/06/2004 10:45:16 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: a_strindberg
I'd want to know the nature of Smith's violation

Pretty much as you guessed. He hadn't paid part of a fine, and had a valid excuse for not doing so. There's no question the system is plagued with judges who aren't interested in passing judgement, but on the surface of it this doesn't look like one of those incidents.

64 posted on 02/06/2004 11:13:51 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson