To: American_Centurion; wildbill
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker
The ANG is full of it (maybe a democrat?).
Just enter "F102 DaNang" in Google and check the first page of entries.
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker
Perhaps the general was referring to a time period later than 1966 after F102s had been replaced--or maybe he was just wrong. After all, it was merely an unrehearsed TV statement without research. I don't know that it matters since his unit was not deployed to Viet Nam in any event.
I understand the F102s were being phased out of the Texas Air Guard at the latter part of Bush's service for a more advanced plane, and since he was not re-enlisting, it was not considered worthwhile to begin his training in the new planes. He was sort of a lame duck training-wise.
18 posted on
02/11/2004 8:49:01 AM PST by
wildbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson