To: tpaine
It is a crying damned shame but thems the facts. I will support no one who doesn't support -- with gusto -- the FMA.
9 posted on
02/25/2004 10:28:19 AM PST by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: King Black Robe
You are supporting the concept that a super-majority can pass an amendment to modify our individual right to marriage into a collective, government approved licensed procedure?
Would you then support the concept that a future super-majority could pass an amendment to modify our individual RKBA's into a collective government approved licensed procedure?
I say a FMA is beyond the scope of the powers granted in our constitution.
21 posted on
02/25/2004 10:52:17 AM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson