Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
The government is leaning on Clear Channel. The government routinely leans on broadcasters. Why do you think the lamestream press does not cover much of what is discussed on FR? Why do they parrot the government line on "AMERITHRAX" when it is obviously a dry hole? The same goes for dozens of other stories. Or look at it this way: If government regulation of radio content is good, why shouldn't Free Republic be licensed by a government agency?
101 posted on 02/26/2004 10:39:12 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
If government regulation of radio content is good, why shouldn't Free Republic be licensed by a government agency?

Because it's longstanding legal doctrine that the airwaves are a public resource.

Google search: "airwaves are a public resource"

The same is not true of the internet.


125 posted on 02/26/2004 10:51:08 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson