Assault Weapon Ban extension PASSES (Senate amendment to gun industry protection bill)

C-Span ^ | 3-2-04 | Sen. Dianne Feinstein D-CA

[Henrietta]

"Yada...yada...yada! Bye...bye...Henrietta...I think your broomstick is double-parked!"

You can't seem to come up with anything substantive to say, can you?

[Redleg Duke]

Okay, little one, have the last word and go off and annoy someone else with your prattle.

[Henrietta]

"Okay, little one, have the last word and go off and annoy someone else with your prattle."

Prattle? Oh, that's rich. You've contributed absolutely nothing of substance to this discussion, and you call what I post PRATTLE?

You need a reality check, pal. While you're at it, check the overinflated ego as well. I'm sure everyone on this thread would rather not have you taking up bandwidth with your self-important insults that wish they could masquerade as something post-worthy.

[archy]

Some of you folks come off not as constitutionalists, but as gun-happy goofs.

All those reasonable folks who are not gun-happy goofs please get in the line on the left! And stay orderly!

[TLI]

Straggly bands of would-be revolutionaries haven't a prayer, and there's no chance in the world that you'll find enough folks to join you to make a bit of difference.

Given that there might be SOME outlandish series of coincidences that would explain your magical insight and knowledge in this error-prone area, allow me to enlighten you a bit. I can assure you that the most destructive weapons imaginable (exceeded only by nukes) is a trained team of about 6 - 10 men.

The "straggly bands" that you refer to generally consist of about 4 such teams. Four teams of 6 - 10 men that are trained in various scenarios can (and often do) accomplish awesome results.

Having been IN several of the "straggly bands" throughout the southwest over a period of 21 years as well as being trained in the military by some of the best SF (and other Armies) produced, do not doubt that such "straggly bands" are present in sufficient numbers and with the appropriate equipment to assure a known outcome to a specific situation.

Now, a pretty drastic set of circumstances would have to exist before you (or anyone else) would be aware of any activity by such a team or teams. Therefore, I am not surprised by a belief as the one you espouse. Fortunately, it is incorrect.

T L I

[BOBWADE]

I for one will vote for Kerry or not vote at all if W signs an AWB. I would rather have one of them screwing us than one of our own. At least the Republicans would stand up to Kerry against something this stupid. I am so Pi$$ed about this. I emailed the Bush-Cheney campaign and asked for clarification about Bush's stance on the AWB. I have yet to get a response so they have yet to get my money.

[ConservativeMan55]

Bump!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Bump!

[TLI]

Bob, Bob, Bob!

Think about not voting for ScaryKerry but for the Constitution Party. Cast a vote that WILL show up on the radar, not one that will be lost in a sea of communism.

Besides, I think the Dems only have about one more pass at doing something with AWB before they just plain run out of steam. I just don't see it going anywhere. There is much more to be concerned with in the area of the criminal invaders of this Republic.

BTW . . ScaryKerry is about the most pin-headed moron the communist agenda Dem's have ever fielded. I swear he has just got to be a scracrifical lamb.