Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martha Stewart Refused April Deal To Avoid Prison
PR Newswire ^ | 3/7/04

Posted on 03/07/2004 8:42:12 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar

Prosecutors Offered Martha Stewart a Deal Last April: Cop To One Count of Making a False Statement and Receive Probation and Continue to Work at Omnimedia, Sources Say

She Refused to Plead Guilty to a Felony

NEW YORK, March 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Newsweek has learned that the Feds gave Martha Stewart an opportunity to avoid prison. Federal prosecutors offered Stewart a deal last April to cop to one count of making a false statement, say several sources familiar with the offer. She would have received probation and could continue working at her company, they say. But she refused to plead guilty to a felony, and a defense source says the Feds couldn't guarantee she would stay out of jail.

And federal investigators say she could have avoided the entire mess if she had confessed in the beginning. Had she admitted wrong doing in early 2002, she could have gotten off with a $200,000 fine and no jail time, report Detroit Bureau Chief Keith Naughton and Special Correspondent Barney Gimbel in the March 15 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, March 8).

After a seven week trial, the jury deliberated for three days before convicting Stewart on all four counts.

One juror sobbed as the judge ticked off all the guilty counts. Martha's daughter, Alexis, doubled over in tears in the front row of the gallery. Alexis's husband John Cuti, also one of Martha's lawyers, buried his face in his hands at the defense table. Stewart stared straight ahead, showing no emotion.

Martha Stewart's case may set the new standard for judging fat cats who don't play by the rules, write Naughton and Gimbel. "We're now going to see the 'Martha test' as a fair punishment for white-collar crimes," says Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, associate dean of the Yale School of Management.

"This is going to have a strong influence on jurors from here on out." And legal experts say she'll likely go to prison for one to three years, probably at a minimum- security "prison farm."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: marthastewart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2004 8:42:12 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Martha will win the appeal, and all the underachieving class-warfare mongers will wail and gnash their teeth.
2 posted on 03/07/2004 8:44:23 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Maybe she'll get to work in the kitchen.
3 posted on 03/07/2004 8:45:59 AM PST by tbeatty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
I hope she doesn't win an appeal. This is about stealing and lying, not class warfare.
4 posted on 03/07/2004 8:47:31 AM PST by tbeatty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
Martha will win the appeal......

On what grounds?

5 posted on 03/07/2004 8:47:59 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Re: Martha Stewart Refused April Deal To Avoid Prison

Hmmm She's dumb, and lies too. No wonder she's a liberal.

6 posted on 03/07/2004 8:48:34 AM PST by ChadGore ("Maybe they thought Saddam would lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
I saw on the news that there have been over six hundred prosecutions of corporate wrongdoing since Enron/WorldCom.

If Martha wasn't a celeb, would you even care that she was convicted of obstructing a fraud investigation or that she lied to federal investigators?
7 posted on 03/07/2004 8:48:38 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Did Rosie make it to all those prosecutions?
8 posted on 03/07/2004 8:50:12 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
She only made it to half of them but Bill Cosby covered the other half for her.
9 posted on 03/07/2004 8:51:57 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
she could have gotten off with a $200,000 fine and no jail time,

Martha needs to fire her lawyer for being stupid or hire someone to kick her in the butt.

Her 'gain' from the stock manipulation was $50,000.

The plea apparently would have cost her $200,000 and no jail time. But she refuses.

Per the Judge Commentator Napolitano on FoxNews, she now has a mandatory sentence of at least 16 months prison time (up to 16 years) and around $1 Million fine.

Either Martha got stupid legal advise or Martha's greed made her stupid.
10 posted on 03/07/2004 8:52:32 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
If through the Court House doors the lesbo Rosie fits, then the jury must acquit.
11 posted on 03/07/2004 8:53:09 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
I think when the time comes for her to go to jail, Martha won't be available.
12 posted on 03/07/2004 8:53:49 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Either Martha got stupid legal advise or Martha's greed made her stupid.

It probably wasn't greed. Sounds more like pride to me. "You can't touch me. I'm Martha!"

13 posted on 03/07/2004 8:55:20 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
She won't win on appeal.
14 posted on 03/07/2004 8:57:05 AM PST by Howlin (Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
It's Door Number Two, Tom.

She's just too greedy and too important to be subjected to the same rules that we, the great unwashed masses, are.

And the funniest part of this deal is that it apparently was on the table until the second they filed the first charges against her; I read back then that she actually accepted the deal, but at the last minute, decided to make a call to somebody at the DOJ and try to go over the head of the New York prosecutor to get an even better deal!

Things went all to hell shortly after that.
15 posted on 03/07/2004 9:00:48 AM PST by Howlin (Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
I'm sick to death of watching all her celebrity friends like Dommick Dunne come on TV and talk about what a travesty this is.

They honestly believe that the rich "are" different!
16 posted on 03/07/2004 9:02:21 AM PST by Howlin (Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
If some smuck teenager keyed Dunne's Mercedes he would be screaming for the kid to get twenty years.
17 posted on 03/07/2004 9:04:26 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Perhaps someone can recall who said a quote I am about to paraphrase: "I would not want to be judged by twelve people too stupid to not get off jury duty."
18 posted on 03/07/2004 9:04:48 AM PST by dmzTahoe (Go Zags!!!...#4 and still rising.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmzTahoe
You can rule out O.J.
19 posted on 03/07/2004 9:05:25 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
She won't win on appeal.

Says you.

20 posted on 03/07/2004 9:06:52 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson