Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beck_isright
The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Paige McKenzie, NewsMax.com

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million jobs lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job record since before World War II, they claim.

One little problem: It's not true.

Not only has there been no net loss of jobs during the Bush administration, there has been a net gain, even with the devastation of 9/11. At least 2.4 million jobs have been created since the president took office, 2 million of those in 2003. The gains more than offset the losses.

While Democrats continue to beat their election-year drums about outsourcing, manufacturing losses, unemployment and slow growth in employment, America’s economy has been steadily creating jobs.

At least 366,000 jobs have been created in the last five months, over 100,000 of those in January, White House press secretary Scott McClellan has noted. And though the eight-month recession “officially” ended in November, economic indicators are surprising economists and pointing toward a take-off in the recovery.

The signs:

The 5.6 percent unemployment rate is the lowest in two years and below the average of the 1980s (7.3 percent) and '90s (5.8 percent), and still continues to drop.

The nation's economic output revealed the strongest quarterly growth in 20 years. The data for the fourth quarter of 2003 show that the civilian labor force rose by 333,000, while the number of unemployed in the labor force dropped by 575,000. Even better, the number of so-called discouraged workers declined in December.

Consumer spending grew between 4 percent and 5 percent last year, and real hourly earnings rose 1.5 percent. Real earnings have risen over the last three years.

Exports doubled to 19 percent in the fourth quarter, compared to less than 9 percent in the third.

The number of American workers is at an all-time high of 138.5 million, a level never before attained in U.S. history.

Jobless claims are 10 percent below the average of the last 25 years and still falling.

Hiring indices are up, even in manufacturing.

Productivity growth is extremely high.

Now the doomsayers are criticizing the validity of the unemployment rate, which at 5.6 percent does not fit their gloomy story.

Faulty Counting

The problem is the areas of biggest job growth are usually not even being counted at all.

Though 75 percent of jobs are created by small companies, according to the Small Business Administration, this sector’s entrepreneurial activity and the jobs it creates are left out by Washington bean counters when calculating official new job numbers.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does its Payroll Survey by phoning businesses to crunch the number of jobs that have been gained or lost. This is where Democrats grabbed onto their lifeline, the 2.3 million figure. Look only at the Payroll Survey, and there has been a gain of only 522,000 jobs since Bush took office.

But here’s the rub. The Household Survey is used to determine the unemployment rate and accounts for those who are self-employed, and small emerging businesses that might be overlooked by the Payroll Survey. But the number of U.S. firms isn’t static, and the "fixed list" used by the BLS for phoning established businesses does not reflect new entrepreneurial activity.

People are called at home and asked if they have jobs, or if they are in the market for a job. In contrast to the Payroll Survey, the Household Survey shows that 2.4 million jobs have been created so far during Bush's time in office.

As Economy.com writer Haseeb Ahmed recently wrote, "something is amiss in the [Payroll] survey."

Credit Where Credit Is Due

That’s not all. When doomsayers, and media spoiling for a fight in an election year, laughed at Bush’s prediction of 2.6 million new jobs this year, not everyone was scoffing.

Ahmed, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and others hardly batted an eye. Greenspan said it was "probably feasible" the economy would reach the Bush administration's forecast of adding 2.6 million jobs this year, provided growth continues and the productivity rate slows to more typically levels.

"I don't think it's 'Fantasyland,'" Greenspan said.

"I agree with him," said John Ryding, chief market economist at Bear Stearns. "I think that we will create 2.5 million, possibly more, jobs over the balance of the year."

Ahmed is convinced that "the revision patterns of the early-1990s recovery cycle" will be repeated. A total of 1.4 million job gains were revised upward to 2.9 million in the first 21 months after the end of the last recession, just after Bush Sr. was voted out of office.

34 posted on 03/09/2004 6:02:22 PM PST by petercooper (Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: petercooper
And now that we've all had a chance to read the RNC faxblast, just how many of those jobs were created directly by or as a result of the government and not private industry? Last month, all 21,000 new jobs were created by the .gov. Chew on that one for a while....
42 posted on 03/09/2004 6:12:46 PM PST by Beck_isright ("I did not have sexual relations with that woman" - (Fill in name of Democrat here))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: petercooper
At least 366,000 jobs have been created in the last five months, over 100,000 of those in January

And to think, that includes the stellar number of 23k (all of which are government jobs) in Feb and the 1k, no I mean 16k, no I mean 8k jobs in Decemeber. Still that's 70k jobs a month -- half of what's needed just to employ the people entering the labor pool.

And though the eight-month recession "officially" ended in November

Is he talking about the 2001 recession?

The Household Survey is used to determine the unemployment rate and accounts for those who are self-employed, and small emerging businesses that might be overlooked by the Payroll Survey.

While I agree that the method of counting employment needs to be improved, the household survey counts you as employed if you did 20 hours of non-paid work for a family business. That's just an example of how this result could be skewed.

Also this article doesn't take into account that the labor market grows each month. Sure a 21k figure might be good, but it isn't if the pool grows by 7x that.

Part of me believes this is why Bush wants to make illegals quasi legal so that he can get some more people into an employment figure as his rosy predictions of job growth since he's been in office have been consistantly off every year.
50 posted on 03/09/2004 6:17:39 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: petercooper
The 5.6 percent unemployment rate is the lowest in two years and below the average of the 1980s (7.3 percent) and '90s (5.8 percent), and still continues to drop.

Yes, and in the 1990's CNN described 5.6% unemployment as "low".
But now 5.6% unemployment is somehow a horrible disaster created by Bush.

I expect this from lying liberal hypocrites, but it's sad to see that so many here are parroting the left's mantra that all is doom and gloom under Bush.

61 posted on 03/09/2004 6:25:15 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson